Links » Cream » Who Lost Canada? America’s Neighbors turn to China for Energy Deal
Links » Cream » Who Lost Canada? America’s Neighbors turn to China for Energy Deal |
- Who Lost Canada? America’s Neighbors turn to China for Energy Deal
- China Faces Shifting Dynamic in Middle East
- Bo, Murder and the Future of the CCP
- Proview Counsel Apparently Forgot the First Rule of Lawyering
- Cartoon: “Sailing the Seas Depends on…”, by Hexie Farm (蟹农场)
- Destiny in the Flood Waters
- Flood Brings Out Beijing’s Digital Samaritans
- Hexie Farm (蟹农场): “Sailing the Seas Depends on…”
- Directives from the Ministry of Truth: Beijing Floods
- The Daily Twit – 7/23/12: Beijing Dries Out, and a Pile of Wet Rocks Elects a Mayor
- Beijing Falls Back on Industrial Policy During Downturn
- Extrapolation Error: Adidas Factory Closing and China’s FDI Flight
- Heavy Rain Kills At Least 37 in Beijing
Who Lost Canada? America’s Neighbors turn to China for Energy Deal Posted: 23 Jul 2012 09:37 PM PDT After 1949 when the Communists defeated the Nationalists for control of China, the mournful refrain from Washington, D.C. was "Who Lost China?" This arrogant display of superpower Cold War finger pointing ended with a number of careers destroyed and an unfair smear on the U.S. State Department that in some ways has never been entirely eradicated. In today's highly-charged political climate, it will come as no surprise when some U.S. politicians come down hard on the Obama Administration for what will no doubt be described as driving Canada's energy sector into the arms of China:
The Nexen deal is important for two reasons. First, it potentially represents some absolution for CNOOC, which is best known in foreign investment circles as the company which botched the 2005 U.S. UNOCAL takeover, not taking into account American politics and the need for a public relations strategy. As the Nexen deal will require regulatory approval in several jurisdictions, we will see what lessons CNOOC has learned from the failed UNOCAL bid. Second, as Bloomberg points out, the deal represents a further shift by Canada away from the U.S. towards China. Another deal involving Sinopec and Talisman Energy was announced yesterday as well, and there have been other recent transactions, including CNOOC's takeover of Nexen partner Opti Canada. Why is this happening? The simple answer is that Canada is one of the world's largest energy suppliers, and rapidly-growing China is willing to pay a premium in the sector to diversify its holdings into a country that is politically stable. China realized years ago the political risks it was facing in the Middle East and set out to remedy the situation. It has succeeded. How important is this strategy to China? CNOOC's bid for Nexen's shares apparently represented a 61% premium. Nexen had to be pleased with that. And China isn't just getting oil for its money. If the deal goes through, CNOOC would also get some very attractive technical expertise, including know-how related to shale-gas extraction. Canada's traditional partner in this area has been the U.S., whose interest in Canadian development has been on the wane. Factor in the decision to reject the Keystone Pipeline project because of American environmental concerns, and China is starting to look better and better to the Canadians. If this investment trend continues, assuming that Ottawa approves the Nexen deal, perhaps in a few years we will all be talking about the new U.S. "Canada Pivot" policy. In the meantime, you can be sure that critics of the controversial Keystone Pipeline decision, particularly Republicans with ties to the oil and gas industry, will use this deal to beat up on President Obama. © Stan for China Hearsay, 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
China Faces Shifting Dynamic in Middle East Posted: 23 Jul 2012 09:40 PM PDT The Diplomat's Minxin Pei writes that China faces an uncertain future with a "newly empowered" Middle East, not only diplomatically but also in terms of its domestic policies toward an increasingly dissatisfied Muslim minority:
In Xinjiang, where tensions have run high in the three years since deadly riots between Uyghurs and Han Chinese in 2009, Radio Free Asia reports that authorities have restricted the public observance of Ramadan:
© Scott Greene for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
Bo, Murder and the Future of the CCP Posted: 23 Jul 2012 09:17 PM PDT For the Financial Times Magazine, Jamil Anderlini traces the rise and fall of former Chongqing party boss and Politburo Standing Committee hopeful Bo Xilai, and the tightrope the party must walk now as they decide how to deal with the fallout:
In Beijing, meanwhile, the French Foreign Ministry denied that alleged Bo family acquaintance Patrick Henri Devillers had been detained upon his arrival over the weekend. From The New York Times:
© Scott Greene for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
Proview Counsel Apparently Forgot the First Rule of Lawyering Posted: 23 Jul 2012 07:59 PM PDT The First Rule of Lawyering, of course, is to make sure you get paid. Criminal defense lawyers know this. You may be familiar with the old line from Primal Fear, where attorney Martin Vail tells his client, who is up on 1st degree murder charges:
Litigators in civil cases don't have that kind of leverage over their clients, but that kind of attitude is often quite useful. Consider our old friends from the iPad trademark dispute:
I can't say I know all the details here, but this doesn't look so good. Proview's financial position was common knowledge, so Grandall knew that these guys were functionally (if not legally) bankrupt. Ordinarily for a client like that, you'd expect a decent upfront retainer payment. I assume Grandall got something at the outset, but maybe not nearly enough. So the court brokered a settlement, and Apple paid the $60 million. The money is apparently sitting there waiting to be parceled out, but Proview owes anywhere from 220 to 400+ million U.S. dollars. That means a "fight" between the creditors, and between those that have some sort of secured interest (i.e. the banks) and Grandall, which just has a service contract, the lawyers may be shit out of luck. Now it's possible that Grandall knew this was going to happen all along, got just enough upfront, and figured that with the publicity and all, the risk was ultimately worth it. Let's hope they didn't seriously believe that Proview might actually get enough to pay off its debts from this dispute — that was never really a possibility, even with a favorable court judgment. I don't recall ever having worked for an insolvent client who wasn't already in bankruptcy proceedings (attorney fees are paid off the top when that happens), and I'm not a litigator, so I can't say what the best method is of avoiding this sort of trouble. That being said, this seems like a crappy result. A friend told me (I can't confirm this) that the same partner/team is now defending Qiaodan in the Michael Jordan trademark squatting case. Knowing what we do about that company's prospects post-judgment, let's hope these guys got a lot up front this time. © Stan for China Hearsay, 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
Cartoon: “Sailing the Seas Depends on…”, by Hexie Farm (蟹农场) Posted: 23 Jul 2012 06:10 PM PDT © Samuel Wade for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
Posted: 23 Jul 2012 05:49 PM PDT Beijing's floods are emblematic of government mismanagement. Chinese netizens are quick to make social critiques of disasters both great and small, and this most recent one has drawn out some dark, incisive jokes:
Via CDT Chinese. © Anne.Henochowicz for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
Flood Brings Out Beijing’s Digital Samaritans Posted: 23 Jul 2012 02:02 PM PDT Netizens have reached out a digital hand to those left stranded by Beijing's torrential rains. There are over 7.4 million posts on Weibo on the subject (北京 + 暴雨), many of them calls for help—and answers. From a CDT Chinese screenshot:
While some embrace those in need, others have taken advantage of the chaos. Weibo user @SuYe reports hotel rip-offs, while @YanYaobin implores the government to follow the lead of ordinary citizens:
At least 37 have died in the floods, including a number of police officers. This post about one of these officers on the official Weibo of the city Public Security Bureau (PSB) has been reposted and commented on over 593,000 times:
Individual heroism mingles with stories of systemic neglect. The state-run newspaper Global Times has acknowledged that Beijing's under-built sewers are in part to blame for the mayhem, though it goes on to suggest "overhauling the entire network may be unfeasible, as it will take time and an enormous injection of cash." On Twitter, Beijinger @MissXQ shares dire stories and photos, including reports that more than 200 senior citizens died in an assisted living facility in Fangshan, a poor district hit hard by the floods:
Tea Leaf Nation has translated more Weibo comments on the flood, while Foreign Policy has created a slide show of the devastation. Read more on the floods and the aftermath from CDT. © Wendy Qian for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
Hexie Farm (蟹农场): “Sailing the Seas Depends on…” Posted: 23 Jul 2012 08:25 AM PDT For his latest contribution to his CDT series, cartoonist Crazy Crab of Hexie Farm re-imagines that Gate of Heavenly Peace, or Tiananmen Gate, which holds a portrait of Mao flanked by the quotes: "Long Live the People's Republic of China" and "Long Live the Great Unity of the World's Peoples." In Crazy Crab's rendering, the ground is flooded, a reference to the recent devastating floods that hit Beijing, and Mao's portrait is replaced with that of a pancake turtle. The Chinese name of this turtle, "wangba 王八" is also a curse word meaning "bastard." The slogan has been replaced with "Sailing the Seas Depends on…" in reference to a famous revolutionary song, "Sailing the Seas Depends on the Helmsman [Mao Zedong]." The government has claimed victory in dealing with the massive floods, which killed at least 37 people, but posts expressing citizens' anger at the failure of the city's drainage system have been deleted. Reports about the floods have been censored and authorities have ordered news organizations to "emphasize the power of human compassion over the elements." Read more about Hexie Farm's CDT series, including a Q&A with the anonymous cartoonist, and see all cartoons so far in the series. [CDT owns the copyright for all cartoons in the Hexie Farm CDT series. Please do not reproduce without receiving prior permission from CDT.] © Sophie Beach for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
Directives from the Ministry of Truth: Beijing Floods Posted: 23 Jul 2012 07:14 AM PDT The following examples of censorship instructions, issued to the media and/or Internet companies by various central (and sometimes local) government authorities, have been leaked and distributed online. Chinese journalists and bloggers often refer to those instructions as "Directives from the Ministry of Truth." CDT has collected the selections we translate here from a variety of sources and has checked them against official Chinese media reports to confirm their implementation. The following directives were first posted on CDT Chinese on July 21, 2012:
© Anne.Henochowicz for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
The Daily Twit – 7/23/12: Beijing Dries Out, and a Pile of Wet Rocks Elects a Mayor Posted: 23 Jul 2012 05:37 AM PDT Most of the news I was wading through today (oops, that was actually unintentional) concerned the Beijing rainstorm/flood. We're still cleaning up parts of the city and outskirts, figuring out what went wrong and, as per standard operating procedure, already laying blame. Tiny echoes of Katrinaesque discussions flying around out there. I wonder if there's a "Heckuva job, Brownie" scapegoat waiting in the wings for the human flesh search engine to expose? Here are a few links to get you up to date, plus all the major papers have coverage: Danwei: The Beijing deluge of 2012 — the blame game begins. Wall Street Journal: Worst Rains in 60 Yrs Produce Fatal Floods in Beijing — More photos. Tea Leaf Nation: Torrential Rain in Beijing Brings Out Best and Worst in China's Capital — Personal anecdotes as told online by weibots. The Next Web: Sina Weibo, China's Twitter, comes to rescue amid flooding in Beijing — How social media was used for information sharing, rescues, etc. Bloomberg: China Plans to Put Garrison on Disputed South China Sea Island — Nice way to reduce tensions! Yay, diplomacy! Global Times: Mayor elected in China's newly established Sansha city — Not to waste any time, the city government of the disputed pile of rocks was formed. I assume they were given a deal similar to that of Hong Kong and Macau, in this case a guarantee that Atlantean law would apply for the next 50 years. By the way, the first mayor is apparently a chap named Arthur Curry. Financial Times: Chinese nationalists eye Okinawa — Uh, I think someone needs to call a time out. Reuters: China eyes new strategic industries to spur economy — In addition to other economic stimulus policies, apparently Beijing will be further strengthening its key sector champions. I guess this is what industrial policy looks like during a recession. Also Sprach Analyst: Wave of business owners running away re-emerges in Yangtze river delta — Your daily dose of scary economic news. Ken Rapoza: In China, Why Piracy Is Here To Stay — Ken talks to Tom Doctoroff about China piracy and he/they fall into a familiar trap, generalizing from digital media infringement. Tsk tsk tsk. Why is all the news today bad? I am now officially bummed out. Nothing left to do but try and cheer myself up with an episode of Red Dwarf. © Stan for China Hearsay, 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
Beijing Falls Back on Industrial Policy During Downturn Posted: 23 Jul 2012 04:45 AM PDT I assume heads exploded in D.C., New York and London when this was reported:
Not exactly a new policy, but perhaps a renewed emphasis. When in doubt, let's prop up those key national champions and make sure that at least those guys are doing OK. This is known variously as "industrial policy," "picking winners and losers," "protectionism," or "strategic planning," depending on your particular biases. For companies in these sectors, which include energy, environmental technology, and information technology, competition may have just become that much more difficult, if that is even possible. Good luck, private enterprise. © Stan for China Hearsay, 2012. | Permalink | One comment | Add to del.icio.us |
Extrapolation Error: Adidas Factory Closing and China’s FDI Flight Posted: 23 Jul 2012 02:32 AM PDT Adidas recently announced that it would be closing its last China manufacturing operation. I didn't write a post about this news since ultimately it wasn't all that surprising. For some time now, companies here with low profit margins and/or those in sectors where labor is a significant component of total costs have been facing difficult times. The first round took place because of the Great Recession, with a lot of export-oriented assembly operations and textile shops going bust. Since then, we've had serious wage inflation and now another drop-off in demand. Scary stuff for manufacturers, but what does it mean, if anything, for the overall foreign investment picture in China? An editorial in the Global Times makes some unfortunate assumptions and comes to the wrong conclusions:
Woof. A few issues here. First, the assumption here is that foreign investors come to China because of cheap labor and l0w tax rates. This was indeed the case, but quite a long time ago. I don't recall seeing a mass exodus of foreign companies after the tax rates were harmonized in 2008. Moreover, labor costs have been going up for a while now, particularly in places like Dongguan, where shortages and cost concerns have been on the minds of my clients for a decade already. Second, the author seems to think that having these cost-conscious shops leave the country is a good thing. Puzzling. Wouldn't it be better if these companies were somehow able to absorb higher costs, reinvent themselves, or somehow figure out a way to maintain employment of hundreds of thousands of Chinese workers? I agree that a country doesn't want to be stuck with low wages, but we've already seen plenty of wage inflation. It's not an "either-or" situation where you either have low wages or no jobs. Sometimes yes, but not always. So while the wage hikes are a positive step, the loss of jobs, some of which may be inevitable, is certainly something "to grieve over." Third, this set of assumptions is just plain wrong: "the model China relied on for so long to absorb foreign investment is not sustainable and came at the expense of local workers' and indigenous companies' interests." Please. Not only do I think the author doesn't understand what that model truly was, but he/she also has no clue how that investment benefited the country as a whole, workers and local companies. China originally encouraged foreign investment for a variety of reasons, including building up foreign exchange reserves and technology transfer. I don't have a citation for this, but I believe that wages in foreign-invested enterprises, on the whole, have been consistently higher than domestically-owned factories. Moreover, where would some of China's key industries be without foreign investment? Ask BYD and SAIC how they'd be doing without Sino-foreign automobile joint ventures. Fourth, this is also downright false: "attempts to hold back wage growth will only delay future economic growth by deflating consumption." The suggestion here is that somehow foreign investors, stuck on "low wage" mode, are actively trying to hold down wage growth in this country. Any evidence of this? No, I didn't think so. Fifth, another whopper: "the favorable treatment many foreign companies received created an unfair business environment which stymied domestic competitors." The only thing I can think of as an example is the favorable tax treatment foreign companies received prior to 2008. That's over with. And anyway, even with those tax breaks, I don't think local companies were being driven out of business as a result. The author of this article apparently doesn't understand that just being a foreign company here carries with it risks and costs not borne by domestic firms. Sixth, and finally, that insane final paragraph I quoted above. China should apparently celebrate the departure of foreign invested enterprises, since it somehow indicates that the country has "moved on" and is developing rapidly from a manufacturing to an innovation economy. This is really awful. The suggestion here is that foreign companies have no reason to be in China once wages are higher. That seems to be a combination of inaccurate beliefs: 1) that China no longer needs/benefits from foreign companies and expertise; and 2) that foreign firms may wish to be here for reasons other than tax breaks and low wages. Outrageously bad column. Around the same I read this last night, I noticed that Global Times also published "4 Die During Pig Rescue and "Goat Man Seen in Utah." I might have been better off with one of those. © Stan for China Hearsay, 2012. | Permalink | 7 comments | Add to del.icio.us |
Heavy Rain Kills At Least 37 in Beijing Posted: 23 Jul 2012 01:50 AM PDT Rainfall of up to 18 inches brought death and disruption to Beijing over the weekend. From Andrew Jacobs at The New York Times:
China Real Time Report, QQ.com, the BBC and Beijing Cream have all posted photo galleries of the floods, with Beijing Cream also sharing video of firefighters and civilians struggling to rescue stranded drivers while drunken foreigners frolicked elsewhere. Fangshan, to the southwest of the city, was hit hardest. The heaviest rain there in 500 years forced over 20,000 from their homes and flooded a major expressway, stranding hundreds of passengers. Parts of Fangshan, according to Bill Bishop at Sinocism, "are so rural and poor that they make Appalachia look almost like Westchester County. Fangshan is a stark reminder of the close proximity of the first and third worlds in China, and given the topology, the deforestation and the poor infrastructure in parts of Fangshan things could really be quite bad there." Global Times reported that mudslides had killed at least one person in the area, while floods had left many others without shelter, power or clean water. The Telegraph's Malcolm Moore later tweeted from the scene, however, that the situation there, "apart from Jingshi expressway, [is] not as bad as feared. Lots of damage, but not many victims, say locals." Although the weekend's weather was exceptional, the failure of drainage infrastructure to cope with the deluge sparked widespread anger. Some accused the authorities of spending billions on cosmetic development projects while neglecting the less glamorous basics. From Josh Chin at China Real Time Report:
A Global Times op-ed agreed that the rain "exposes holes in [China's] modernization drive", and described the city's lack of preparedness as "unforgivable".
Another target was the lack of timely warning of the disaster. From Charles Custer at Tech in Asia:
There were also, however, tales of city workers and police officers braving the elements to help people in trouble, with one policeman among the dead in Fangshan. Many private citizens and businesses also went to great lengths to help others, according to Stephen Chen at the South China Morning Post:
And from Tea Leaf Nation:
© Samuel Wade for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012 |
Comments