Links » Cream » How China Saw the Olympic Opening Ceremony
Links » Cream » How China Saw the Olympic Opening Ceremony |
- How China Saw the Olympic Opening Ceremony
- Gold Farming for College Credit: Berkeley Offers China Online Game Class
- Beijing Floods, Act III: the Negligence Claims
- Photo: School children in Hong Kong, by Henrik Berger Jørgensen
- Tenuous Calm After Pollution Protests (Updated)
- Photos: Unrest in Qidong
- China Eases Restrictions on Foreign Investors
- Hong Kong Protests Patriotism Classes
How China Saw the Olympic Opening Ceremony Posted: 29 Jul 2012 09:33 PM PDT Since the opening of the Beijing Olympics four years ago—a declaration of national arrival which awed some and terrified others—the question has lingered of how London would follow it. Comparisons were inevitable, and perhaps even invited: while China paired one girl's voice with another's face for a rendition of "Ode to the Motherland", director Danny Boyle had "God Save The Queen" sung and signed by a choir including deaf and wheelchair-bound children. Lauren Collins examined the contrast at The New Yorker, where she awarded Boyle a gold medal for his three-hour tribute to British music, literature, industry and healthcare.
Among the most eagerly anticipated reviews were those from China itself. The Telegraph reported reactions from CCTV, Xinhua and a couple of men on the street:
The BBC also explored Chinese views of the ceremony and the games more generally, including the security arrangements and the booming trade in Union Jack underpants.
Also writing before the ceremony, Global Times seemed less convinced that any valuable lessons lay in London, though it at least approved of the organisers' choice of Chinese fireworks.
The Legal Evening News was still more blunt, according to Simon Rabinovitch at The Financial Times:
But Bird's Nest co-designer Ai Weiwei, who wrote last week of his hopes for a more inclusive Games in London than in Beijing, gave the ceremony a glowing review at The Guardian:
© Samuel Wade for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
Gold Farming for College Credit: Berkeley Offers China Online Game Class Posted: 29 Jul 2012 08:03 PM PDT
I figure this sounds much more fun than it really is. This course undoubtedly includes the same sort of reading list that would be required with any China history/culture class, so it's not like the kids are going to escape the real work. Additionally, as with any online game, it can become dull and tedious as one grinds away, hour after hour, going on missions, looking for gold, killing things and breaking shit (or blowing things up, depending on the game). After a while, it just seems like work. To be honest, after about two or three hours of most games, for me it's a toss-up between soldiering on and ditching the game for a good book. I wonder if the Berkeley class will require a certain number of game hours played, in-game achievements, etc.? If you get to a certain level, maybe you can earn extra credit, but let's hope that the game in question isn't one of those where you can simply buy your way to better weapons and higher levels — that wouldn't exactly be fair, would it? Anyway, the idea itself is cool in terms of educational creativity, although it does sort of discriminate against the older students. Imagine going back to school after 20 years to get a college degree and your professor, who is probably younger than you are, tells you that you have to learn how to play a MMORPG to graduate. I assume your reaction would be "What the &$^@ is an MMORPG, and can I pick one up at the bookstore?" If this Berkeley class is a hit, I'm going to try and find a game for my class. What would be the most appropriate for a foreign investment law class? © Stan for China Hearsay, 2012. | Permalink | 3 comments | Add to del.icio.us |
Beijing Floods, Act III: the Negligence Claims Posted: 29 Jul 2012 07:35 PM PDT
Standard negligence argument, right? a) company had duty of care regarding management of the highway in question; b) rainstorm and related problems were foreseeable; c) company was negligent in allowing traffic onto the road given the flooding; and d) company was negligent in not having additional staff on hand to deal with storm-related issues. Sounds like a pretty good case. I don't think the "We haven't had rain like this in X number of years" defense against foreseeability holds up. Moreover, even if the company wasn't aware of the specific traffic conditions on all parts of the road when motorists were being charged tolls and allowed to drive on, I assume that the company ought to have known. Here's a second opinion on the case:
There you have it. Bad news for the company, although a good "design defect" argument might be a mitigating factor. Heck, who am I kidding? If this whole thing goes down the same way as other natural disasters, also food scandals, the government will get directly involved in an overall settlement, pooling compensation on the one side and qualified victims on the other. The companies involved will piss and moan, and then go on about their business, and the victims will bitterly complain about insufficient damages. Mission accomplished, in terms of a harmonious-ish settlement. While this goes on, many of these individual complaints, some of which will be filed in Beijing courts, will be quietly dismissed pending formal action on the settlement fund. (I'm assuming, by the way, that these companies are private. If they are part of the municipal or State government, then that throws a wrench into the litigation analysis of course.) Is that the best possible outcome? Well, I'm biased in favor of tort cases. In addition to being a U.S. lawyer, I grew up in the Ralph Nader age, where public interest lawyers used tort to get bad actor corporations to learn the error of their ways. There are only two ways to do that, you know. First, government can regulate. This doesn't work so well in some places and with certain industries. In the U.S., the government has been "captured" by companies in many industrial sectors, precluding effective enforcement. Second, the tort system can be wielded by individuals in court, given legal standing, as a weapon against misbehaving companies. The business end of that weapon is, of course, punitive damages, which can be high enough to hurt these guys' bottom lines. The U.S. tort system is aggressive and has often been abused. However, that's what judges are for (and an independent judiciary), but that's a long discussion. Suffice it to say that in my opinion, the good has outweighed the bad. The modern American environmental movement, for example, owes a very great deal to the tort system. China also has a tort system, and a fairly new tort law, but we do not have anything here resembling the structure that Ralph Nader used to such great effect. The entire system is different here, including trial procedure and discovery, which precludes the kind of tort litigation for which America has become famous (or infamous). And the goals here are different. With a large-scale problem like some of the food scandals or a natural disaster, the priority is to get some compensation to the victims in an efficient, non-confrontational manner. No fighting, no disharmony, and certainly none of the U.S.-style litigation ugliness, including the siphoning away of a lot of compensation to plaintiffs' attorneys. We don't have punitive damages here, and if companies do bad things, well, that's a problem for prosecutors and administrative enforcement. Will we see the usual settlement fund for the floods? I'd expect that, yes. Will this change the bad behavior of companies like this highway management firm? I doubt it, and I'd rather see a hefty civil complaint that makes them hurt and scares other companies out there. But that isn't going to happen, and at least with a settlement fund, some folks will come away with something. Best possible outcome. © Stan for China Hearsay, 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
Photo: School children in Hong Kong, by Henrik Berger Jørgensen Posted: 29 Jul 2012 07:18 PM PDT School children in Hong Kong © Sophie Beach for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
Tenuous Calm After Pollution Protests (Updated) Posted: 29 Jul 2012 05:38 PM PDT AFP reports quiet in Qidong amid a heavy police presence following Saturday's violent protests against a planned pipeline.
A reporter for The Asahi Shimbun, Atsushi Okudera, was reportedly beaten by police while covering the protests. The newspaper has complained to the Chinese government, and Japan's Consulate General in nearby Shanghai is investigating the incident. From The Asahi Shimbun:
CHRD's account of how the violence started, if true, may blunt some criticism of the protesters' conduct. Shanghai-based blogger Jian Shuo Wang wrote on Saturday that "we crossed the line, seriously crossed the line […]. Right goal always cannot prove the rightness of process. If we continue to follow the current thinking too far, China may enter into the next terrible violence-ruled circle." Others, though, have suggested that violence is inevitable when other avenues for raising grievances are blocked. From Tsinghua professor Patrick Chovanec, for example:
Peaceful protest did seem to have secured the closure of a controversial chemical plant in Dalian last year. But even Dalian was a sign of a dysfunctional system, Tang Hao wrote soon afterwards at chinadialogue, lamenting the "sinister truth[ that] from officials to activists, everyone is ignoring the rules".
Tang noted, however, that such protests might ultimately lead to "positive interaction and system reform", pointing to Taiwan's environmental and other campaigns of the 1980s. Mark McDonald cited Dalian, Qidong, Shifang and others as possible signs of a developing "Chinese Street" at The New York Times' Rendezvous blog:
Other, offline factors are also at play, Willy Wo-Lap Lam of the Chinese University of Hong Kong told Bloomberg:
See also CDT's collection of photos and video from the protests and an infographic, translated by Tea Leaf Nation, explaining the protesters' grievances. [Updated at 23:40 PST]: Global Times reports one arrest for "spreading rumors online saying police had beaten to death a young man and a 9-year-old girl". The Japanese paper company at the centre of the controversial plans has again defended its adherence to environmental standards. From AFP:
In a very extensive round-up of photos, commentary and other information, Minister of Tofu Jing Gao translated a selection of posts by prominent microbloggers, many of whom expressed mixed feelings about protesters' use of violence.
At Global Voices, Oiwan Lam outlined the heated disagreement between the protesters' critics and supporters:
Global Times editor in chief Hu Xijin criticised all parties, from the Qidong local government to those who cheered on the violence. The netizen comments chosen to accompany his on the newspaper's website spread the blame even further, to government control of the media and heavy-handed policing:
A Global Times editorial even implied that the central government shared some blame for failing to give local authorities sufficient guidance:
© Samuel Wade for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
Posted: 29 Jul 2012 01:40 PM PDT Saturday's protests in Qidong, Jiangsu, over a proposed pipeline, escalated into violence and riot police were called in. Numerous photographs of the scene have been distributed online by bystanders, which show an immense crowd gathered outside the local city government offices and large numbers of police. Some protesters broke into the offices and were shown on the building rooftop. Violence broke out on both sides, and the photos and video below show protesters being beaten as well as overturned police cars. For more on the protests, see yesterday's CDT post and a post from Tea Leaf Nation.
The following video of Qidong was posted by Boxun News:
See more photos of the unrest via CDT Chinese [zh] (here, here and here), on Cryptome and via the official Global Times. © Sophie Beach for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
China Eases Restrictions on Foreign Investors Posted: 29 Jul 2012 11:09 AM PDT Despite China's launching of a body to screen foreign investment in Chinese companies, Beijing has now announced it will relax its control over qualified foreign institutional investers (QFII), from Xinhua:
According to the Wall Street Journal, the new regulations are similar to the draft rules issued last month:
As China's economy looks as though it will miss it's 2012 growth target, the CSRC claims foreign investors will be able to make more long-term investments, Reuters reports:
© Melissa M. Chan for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
Hong Kong Protests Patriotism Classes Posted: 29 Jul 2012 11:08 AM PDT Amid fears that the mainland is increasing their involvement in Hong Kong politics, the San Francisco Chronicle reports parents, students, and teachers took to the streets in Hong Kong to protest China's planned curriculum change:
According to the New York Times, protesters have referred to the change as 'brainwashing':
Hong Kong officials have responded to the protests claiming they only used the China booklet as a model, but Hong Kong residents have expressed discontent for its officials. From Reuters UK:
These protests come during a time when anti-Beijing sentiments are high, AFP adds:
Read more about Hong Kong's relationship with the mainland, via CDT. © Melissa M. Chan for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
You are subscribed to email updates from Update » Links » China 优文 Cream To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
Comments