Blogs » Politics » Protests Over Chemical Plant in Ningbo Continue

---

• Protests Over Chemical Plant in Ningbo Continue
• Photo: Labrang Monastery, Xiahe, Gansu, by Seba Della y Sole Bossio
• Seventh Self-Immolation This Week Brings Total to More Than 60
• Sensitive Words: Ningbo Protests and More
• Weibo Blocks Photo Uploading in Ningbo
• New York Times Wen Exposé Makes Waves

Protests Over Chemical Plant in Ningbo Continue Posted: 27 Oct 2012 11:14 PM PDT Residents of Ningbo have been protesting a proposed expansion of a petrochemical plant, citing environmental concerns. From the New York Times: The protesters, who witnesses said numbered in the thousands, were opposing the expansion of a state-run Sinopec plant, which is already one of the nation's largest refineries. Local residents, citing environmental concerns, have been demanding that the government move the plant from Ningbo, a prosperous city of 3.4 million in Zhejiang Province, not far from Shanghai. The clashes come at a delicate time for the government, as it prepares for a once-a-decade change in leadership that is scheduled to begin on Nov. 8 during a weeklong series of meetings in Beijing. Public concerns about industrial pollution have become a problem for the governing Communist Party, which often backs economic growth over public concerns about environmental degradation. The Washington Post reports that the protests are continuing on Sunday: Several hundred citizens of Ningbo, which is in Zhejiang province, set off from a city square and headed for the offices of the municipal government on Sunday morning. Hundreds were stopped at the gate of the offices by a circle of uniformed police. They shouted for the release of people they believed had been detained by police a day earlier, for the protection of Ningbo and for the city's mayor to come out. "We can only depend on ourselves now, we can't count on the government to think about us," said one protester, a 40-year-old woman surnamed Jing. On Saturday, residents reported that protests involved thousands of people and turned violent after authorities used tear gas and arrested participants. Authorities said "a few" people disrupted public order by staging sit-ins, unfurling banners, distributing fliers and obstructing roads. Authorities said that the proposed project was under evaluation and that the public was being given opportunities to offer its input. [...] In a statement, the Zhenhai district government condemned those it blamed for organizing sit-ins and blocking roads in Ningbo but insisted that public sentiment would be taken into consideration before the start of construction. "Detailed information will be published when environmental reviews are implemented, and public opinions on the project will be heeded," the statement said. Censors are quickly deleting references to the protests and have banned photo saving and uploading in Ningbo on Sina Weibo. Read about a similar incident in which residents of Xiamen successfully stopped the bid for a paraxylen plant, the same kind that is proposed in Ningbo. © Sophie Beach for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us Post tags: democracy, NIMBY, Ningbo Download Tools to Circumvent the Great Firewall

Photo: Labrang Monastery, Xiahe, Gansu, by Seba Della y Sole Bossio Posted: 27 Oct 2012 10:41 PM PDT Labrang Monastery, Xiahe, Gansu © Sophie Beach for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us Post tags: Download Tools to Circumvent the Great Firewall

Seventh Self-Immolation This Week Brings Total to More Than 60 Posted: 27 Oct 2012 03:32 PM PDT Four self-immolations by Tibetans in the past three days brings the total to seven this week and at least 62 since 2009. According to the scant details available about the most recent cases, three of the four self-immolators have died. Since February 2009, Tibetans in various regions have set themselves on fire as a form of protest against Beijing's policies in Tibet. Radio Free Asia reports on two men who set themselves on fire in Sangchu (Xiahe) county, near Labrang Monastery in Gansu, on Friday. Both died: In the first incident, Lhamo Tseten, 24, set himself ablaze at 2:30 p.m. near a People's Armed Police post in Amchok township, Sangchu county, in the Kanlho (in Chinese, Gannan) Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture. The other self-immolation occurred almost six hours later when Tsepak Kyab, 21, burned to death on the main street of Sangkhok township, also in Sangchu, a Tibetan living in India told RFA's Tibetan service. The past week saw five protest burnings in Gansu and brings to 60 the total number of self-immolations challenging Beijing's rule since February 2009. Lhamo Tseten torched himself after lunch with his friends in Amchok township. "He was dining at a restaurant with friends. Then he slowly walked out, and, amid shouts from the crowd, ran into the street engulfed in flames," one witness said, according to Tibetan websites. Earlier this week, two men, Dorjee Rinchen and Dhondup, died after setting themselves on fire in the same region while another man, Lhamo Kyeb, died elsewhere in Sangchu (Xiahe) County. Over the weekend, reports came in about an earlier incident on Thursday in which twins both self-immolated; one of them reportedly died. From AP: The London-based group Free Tibet said cousins Tsepo, 20, and Tenzin, 25, called for independence for Tibet as they set themselves ablaze Thursday in front of a government building in their village in Biru county north of Lhasa, Tibet's main city. Tsepo reportedly died and Tenzin's condition was unknown after he was taken away by authorities, Free Tibet said. Stephanie Brigden, the director of Free Tibet, a London-based exile organization, explains the difficulty in obtaining information about the incidents: "It has taken two days for information about this latest protest [by Tsepo and Tenzin] to emerge. Tibetans in Driru County are being intimidated in both visible and invisible ways. "Chinese state security forces have been deployed in large numbers across Driru County. The internet and telephones are often blocked and, when they are working, Tibetans are afraid to talk about what is happening because they fear that their communications are being monitored by the government. Given recent disappearances and convictions of up to seven years imprisonment related to charges of sharing information, their fears are likely to be justified. High Peaks Pure Earth blog tweeted about the apparent silence from websites inside Tibet: #Tibetan blog site Sangdhor.com down. No new posts on Chodme tibetcm.com since Oct 20, nothing on amdotibet.cn since Oct 24 — HighPeaks PureEarth (@hpeaks) October 27, 2012 In an effort to end the deaths and to gather information about the planning of the self-immolations, the government in some regions has offered reward money for information about planned incidents, Voice of America reports. Robert Barnett, a Tibet expert at Columbia University, weighs in on the potential impact of this move: Barnett says it is difficult to determine the significance of the reward money. "If they [Chinese officials] are moving to a stage where they think that the exiles are planning them (the self-immolations) rather than just encouraging them, that would be a new development," he said. And Barnett says there appears to be an element of fear about how the powerfully symbolic protests are spreading. "I think that this [the patten of self-immolations] is conceived as dangerous by the authorities. The fact that this movement is spreading further to the east, closer to the Chinese borders, into these populations where you have educated Tibetans – students, monks – who have a tradition of thinking for themselves, I think they may be concerned about this," he said. Meanwhile, in the New York Times, Didi Kirsten Tatlow links the recent self-immolations to government propaganda, including a song performed by famous folk singer and incoming First Lady Peng Liyuan: The "Laundry Song" is a nearly 50-year-old propaganda classic, meant to persuade Tibetans of the People's Liberation Army's virtues, but its spirit clearly doesn't resonate with the more than 60 men and women who have burned themselves to death protesting the Communist Party's rule over Tibet. Here's the first verse of the song, which can be heard in full by clicking on the video footage [below]: "Hey! Who is going to help us turn over a new leaf? Who is going to liberate us? It's the dear P.L.A., The saving star of the Communist Party. The army and the people are one family, Helping us to wash our clothes." [...] "For the Sino-Tibetan relationship though, the song puts the Tibetans firmly in a position of subservience, as natives, full of gratitude for the help of the benevolent People's Liberation Army. The trope of washing clothes fits in also with the Socialist preoccupation with Patriotic Hygiene," since "observing hygiene rules came to be seen as patriotic," [High Peaks Pure Earth] wrote. Five years after Ms. Peng's spirited rendition was aired by the state broadcaster CCTV, the shocking, early flickers of self-immolations appear to be spreading into something more like a horrifying and persistent fire. For a full list of and details about protesters who have self-immolated, see Free Tibet or the International Campaign for Tibet [as of this posting, these lists had not yet been updated to include the three most recent incidents.] Both these organizations report 59 cases, not including the most recent three. Tibetan writer Woeser reports a slightly different number due to two cases whose circumstances are not clear. Read more about self-immolations via CDT. © Sophie Beach for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us Post tags: self-immolation, Tibet, tibet politics Download Tools to Circumvent the Great Firewall

Sensitive Words: Ningbo Protests and More Posted: 27 Oct 2012 09:24 AM PDT "We want to survive, we want to get by." As of October 27, the following search terms are blocked on Sina Weibo (not including the "search for user" function): Protests in Ningbo: Thousands in the coastal city are demonstrating against the expansion of a petrochemical plant. - Zhenhai (镇海): Zhenhai Refining & Chemical Company, which is planning to expand its plant's capacity. - PX: Paraxylene, one of the chemicals the plant would produce. Protesters in Xiamen successfully blocked a PX plant from being built their city in 2007. - tear gas (催泪弹): Netizens report the Ningbo special police have thrown tear gas at protesters. - We want to survive, we want to get by (我们要生存 我们要活命): Slogan seen on a banner carried by protesters. - collectively petition officials (集体上访) - Ningbo + take a walk (宁波+散步) - impose martial law (戒严): Re-tested. - blockade (封锁): Re-tested. Other: - Yinggehai (莺歌海): Village in Hainan Province where residents are protesting the construction of a coal-burning power plant. - Zhao Lianhai (赵连海): Activist who advocated for the parents of children poisoned by melamine-tainted milk powder in 2008. In 2010 he was sentenced to two-and-a-half years in prison. - Fan Qihang (樊奇杭): The first "Beat Black case" in Chongqing. Fan was sentenced to death and executed in September 2010. Note: All Chinese-language words are tested using simplified characters. The same terms in traditional characters occasionally return different results. CDT Chinese runs a project that crowd-sources filtered keywords on Sina Weibo search.  CDT independently tests the keywords before posting them, but some searches later become accessible again. We welcome readers to contribute to this project so that we can include the most up-to-date information. To add words, check out the form at the bottom of CDT Chinese's latest sensitive words post. © Anne.Henochowicz for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us Post tags: beat black, censorship, Chongqing, environmental protests, Fan Qihang, Hainan, Internet censorship, netizens, Ningbo, protests, PX, sensitive words, sina weibo, weibo, Yinggehai, Zhao Lianhai Download Tools to Circumvent the Great Firewall

Weibo Blocks Photo Uploading in Ningbo Posted: 27 Oct 2012 08:43 AM PDT Among ongoing protests in Ningbo against the expansion of a petrochemical plant, Sina Weibo users report they are unable to upload photos to the site from local IP addresses. Attempts are met with this message: "20021 transmitted contents is illegal." Netizens recommend the following workarounds: 1. Change your location on your Weibo profile to another province. 2. Turn off the wifi connection on your phone. 3. Turn off Weibo geotagging. View images of the protests at Tea Leaf Nation. Via CDT Chinese. © Anne.Henochowicz for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us Post tags: censorship, environmental protests, Internet censorship, Ningbo, protests, sina weibo Download Tools to Circumvent the Great Firewall

New York Times Wen Exposé Makes Waves Posted: 27 Oct 2012 01:18 AM PDT David Barboza's investigation of the wealth built by Wen Jiabao's extended family has dominated China news since its publication by The New York Times early on Friday. While the basic fact that wealth and power go hand in hand may surprise few—China Daily Show joked that anthropologists had discovered one man in a remote Chinese village who was shocked by the revelation—the sheer scale of the family's business dealings has taken some aback. Besides, as Bloomberg's Mike Forsythe tweeted, "there is a HUGE difference between 'knowing' and DOCUMENTING which NYT did!" In a short follow-up article at The New York Times, Barboza explained how he had obtained these documents: Thirty years of economic reform — and government policies aimed at attracting foreign investment — have created a set of government agencies that keep records on private corporations and their major shareholders, including copies of resumes and government-issued identity cards. It is this system that allows news organizations, including The New York Times, to request and review corporate records. Although ordinary citizens are not allowed access to the records, they can hire a lawyer or consulting firm to request documents for a fee of $100 to $200 per company. The Times used this process in obtaining thousands of pages of corporate documents to review the business networks controlled by the relatives of Prime Minister Wen Jiabao. More details on the year-long investigation came from the Times' public editor, Margaret Sullivan, who revealed that the newspaper had discussed the article with Chinese officials. The warning this provided may have contributed to the unusual speed with which censors pounced in the early hours of Friday morning. Joseph Kahn, the foreign editor, told me that he knew when the reporting on this story began – about a year ago – that it would be a "threshold issue" for the Chinese government. "I expected it to test the limits of what they would tolerate from the foreign media," he said. (In speaking with me, he emphasized that Mr. Barboza's direct editor on the story was Dean Murphy, a deputy business editor.) "For us, this is just classic New York Times investigative journalism," Mr. Kahn said. "It's what reporters do. For them, this is not what reporters do. This is what reporters are banned from doing." He said he believed that, by various means, the story is still getting out in China and that "it has done nothing to diminish the reputation of our journalism." Mr. Kahn said that as recently as Wednesday, Mr. Sulzberger and the executive editor, Jill Abramson, met with Chinese government representatives at The Times. But the focus of that conversation was not about the journalism – it was about a political and cultural differences. In short, Chinese officials were making the case that The Times not publish the article. From some angles, this case must have looked persuasive. As Sullivan noted, the Times is now exiled from China just months after investing heavily in a Chinese-language site. It faces irate advertisers—who were not forewarned of the article and its likely consequences—at a time when ad revenues are already dropping sharply. But at The Guardian, Michael Wolff argued that the moral victory is well worth the immediate financial cost: The Times' story, by David Barboza, is the type of journalism that not only catches the powerful in flagrante delicto, but that revivifies the paper's reason for being. This has not been a kind few years for the Times, with its management, its journalism, and its prospects, under constant and more often than not unflattering scrutiny. But a story like this is something of an instant brand turnaround. The New York Times took on China and, in the first round, won. This being China, the Times will, surely, be engaged in a constant battle going forward – even, perhaps, a confrontation that defines the sides in some new international press battle. That will, no doubt, be to its short term economic disadvantage. But that is good news for the Times, too. […] The Times released dismal earnings yesterday and its stock dropped by more than 20%. But its real value took an incalculable leap today. Reactions were not uniformly rapturous, however. The Chinese government voiced its displeasure through both heavy online censorship and its Foreign Ministry spokesman. From the BBC: "Some reports smear China and have ulterior motives," Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei said when asked about the story in a daily press briefing. On the blocking, he said the internet was managed "in accordance with laws". […] The BBC has also been affected, with the BBC World News channel blocked when a correspondent was asked about the story during a report, and the BBC News website blocked later on Friday. Regarding this censorship, Graham Webster explained on his Transpacifica blog "what it means when we say NYT is 'blocked in China'", while Max Fisher at The Washington Post discussed the risk that restricting access to such a prominent site might simply draw attention to Barboza's report: 此地无银三百两. Tea Leaf Nation's Rachel Lu reported suggestions on Sina Weibo—similar to one source's suspicion expressed in the article itself—that the Times had recently been fed its information by Wen's enemies, and become a "puppet" in the political manoeuvring ahead of the 18th Congress in November. (Bear in mind Barboza and Sullivan's statements that work on the article began in late 2011.) Just three days before the article's publications, overseas Chinese media reported that a portfolio of documents on Wen had been delivered to various foreign media outlets. As Wen presents himself as a champion of China's liberals and reformers, many assumed that the dirt on Wen was given to foreign media by Wen's enemies or supporters of former Chongqing Party Secretary Bo Xilai, the fallen symbol of the conservative camp who yearned for a return to Communist or Maoist orthodoxy. "What position is the New York Times taking? Have they been bought out by the supporters of Mao?" asked one user. "All sides are making their final moves and positioning their pieces–that is what I think about the NYT's headline today," commented another. Some believe the newspaper is being used as a pawn in the power struggle, "This time NYT really does not understand China–too much of a puppet." […] No matter what happens to Wen and the line-up at the 18th Party Congress, Wen's political legacy and historical image are likely to be forever tainted by the revelations in the article. One social media user has no sympathy: "A giant when he talks, but a dwarf when he acts. Fare thee well." At Reuters' Breaking Views, John Foley anticipated gentler repercussions for Wen, arguing that the explosive details would be dampened by the familiarity of the general theme. Fix one problem, and along comes another. On the day China expelled disgraced politician Bo Xilai from its parliament, a New York Times investigation alleged that Premier Wen Jiabao's family controls financial assets worth $2.7 billion. The suggestion is explosive, particularly of a leader who has spoken out about inequality. But it is also mundane, and won't much change the calculus for investors in the People's Republic. With only around three weeks until Wen steps down from his party post, the risk that this becomes a social hot potato is slight. China's censorship machine works as efficiently as ever: visits to the New York Times website were swiftly blocked. Blog users discussed the story, but only in euphemism, referring to Wen by names like "Wo Jia Baobao" – "My baby". Though the details are juicy, the idea that China's elite are very rich is hardly surprising. […] Consider this year's civil service examinations, which are on course to attract a record number of applicants – in some cases with 9000 applications for a single post. That power breeds money is China's worst kept secret. Isabel Hilton elaborated at The Guardian: In 1992 the late Deng Xiaoping, the Chinese former leader and father of "socialism with Chinese characteristics", said: "Let a part of the population get rich first." He did not explicitly assign that leading role to the Chinese Communist party, but the party, which continues to insist on its exclusive right to rule and its vanguard role in Chinese politics and society, took Deng's instructions to heart. […] The symbiosis of politics and money extends to China's parliament, the National People's Congress which, as the annual Hurun report on China's rich has shown, is now a billionaires' club: the wealthiest 70 members enjoy a combined net worth of $85bn. By way of comparison, the estimated combined net worth of 660 top US officials, including the president, reportedly adds up to a mere $7.5bn. The extent of the NPC members' combined wealth was originally dug out of Hurun's figures by Michael Forsythe at Bloomberg in February.  This enormous accumulation of wealth threatens the view that, as The Financial Times' Jamil Anderlini put it early this month, "while there may be corruption and wrongdoing at lower levels, the system is governed by clean and selfless elites who live only to serve the masses." Barboza's article does not implicate Wen himself of corruption, but any discussion of the wealth surrounding the pinnacle of Chinese power is deeply sensitive, particularly before a leadership transition already shaken by the fall of the now scapegoated Bo Xilai. From The Economist: Mr Wen and his fellow leaders would prefer any public attention to the business dealings of the powerful to be focused on the family of Bo Xilai, the former party chief of Chongqing region in the south-west. Coincidentally, just after publication of the New York Times story, it was announced that Mr Bo had been expelled from the NPC. This was hardly a shock given that he had already been stripped of every other title, including last month his membership of the party. It prepares the way, however, for Mr Bo to be put on trial (NPC membership confers a token immunity from prosecution). This event will likely be staged some time in the next few months and will be the most sensational of its kind involving a deposed Chinese leader since the trial of the "Gang of Four" in 1980. Managing news coverage of it will be a huge challenge to the "collective leadership". It will want to convince the public that Mr Bo and family members were engaged in egregious corruption (not least in order to block any possibility of a political comeback by the ambitious Mr Bo). But it will not want gossip to spread about the business affairs of other ruling families (squirrelling money abroad appears a national pastime, as we explain in our China section this week). The man all but certain to succeed Mr Wen next March, his deputy, Li Keqiang, will be among those squirming. In a powerful report just published, Cheng Li of the Brookings Institution in Washington, DC, has exposed the prominent role of Li Keqiang's younger brother, Li Keming, in the tobacco industry—even as Li Keqiang has been overseeing reform of the health sector. Airing such conflicts of interest is taboo in the Chinese press. While the authorities scuttled to cover up the New York Times exposé, The New Yorker's Evan Osnos diagnosed transparency: The most substantive measure [the government] might take would be to require public officials to declare their assets, an idea that has been gaining favor among Chinese commentators in recent years. China had nearly ten million public servants, but local experiments to make them own up to what they own have failed. "No experiment that discloses the assets of junior officials but allows senior officials to continue keeping their assets secret can really expect to gain enough credibility and support to be sustainable," Yiyi Lu, an expert on Chinese civil society, wrote recently. "If the party is genuinely prepared to embrace reform and openness, then disclosure of officials' assets must start from those in the most senior positions." The Party is running out of time not because corruption is a drag on the economy—it can outrun that effect—but because the public is losing confidence. Last year, when two trains crashed on a stretch of China's new railways, citizens were not inclined to see it as an example of the inevitable problems that accompany an ambitious new improvement to public transportation. Instead, they circulated an anonymous message that read, in part: "When a country is so corrupt that one lightning strike can cause a train crash … none of us are exempt. China today is a train rushing through a lightning storm…. We are all passengers." © Samuel Wade for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | One comment | Add to del.icio.us Post tags: 18th party congress, billionaires, civil service, corporate governance, corruption, Deng Xiaoping, economic reform, Evan Osnos, inequality, Internet censorship, investigative journalism, journalism, Li Keqiang, National People's Congress, new york times, official corruption, sina weibo, wealth gap, Wen Jiabao Download Tools to Circumvent the Great Firewall

You are subscribed to email updates from Update » Blogs » Politics To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.	Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610