Links » Cream » One School’s Stability Maintenance Instructions
Links » Cream » One School’s Stability Maintenance Instructions |
- One School’s Stability Maintenance Instructions
- Chinese Couples Seek American Surrogate Mothers
- One Year Later, Wukan Faces Same Challenges
- Photo: Street in Baiyang town, Baoshan, Shanghai, by Remko Tanis
- The Rich List, “Brother Watch” and the Gini Coefficient in China
- Foxconn Plant Open, But Broader Issues Persist
- Does Mitt Romney Know the Difference Between Currency Manipulation and IP Infringement?
- No Passport, No U.S. Visit For Ai Weiwei
- Photographs Capture a Disappearing China
- 20 Die in Coal Mine Plunge
- Let Them Eat Pop-Tarts!
- The Daily Twit – 9/25/12: Giraffes on Frickin’ Aircraft Carriers
- Taobao Links Up With Another U.S. IP Advocacy Group
One School’s Stability Maintenance Instructions Posted: 26 Sep 2012 12:01 AM PDT The following document from an unnamed university (apparently located in Shaanxi Province) is available, uncensored, within the Great Firewall on Baidu Wenku:
Via CDT Chinese. Translation by Mengyu Dong. © Anne.Henochowicz for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
Chinese Couples Seek American Surrogate Mothers Posted: 25 Sep 2012 11:50 PM PDT Stories of Chinese mothers travelling to the U.S. to give birth have become familiar. Global Times' Xuyang Jingjing, though, describes a growing trend of Chinese couples seeking American surrogate mothers. The babies' U.S. citizenship is a welcome side effect, but not the primary objective. Instead, prospective parents turn to America because of its higher success rate and "more developed and open" system for surrogacy.
Demand from Chinese couples has driven up prices for eggs from Chinese-American donors, according to a February report by The Los Angeles Times' Shan Li:
Commercial surrogacy in China has suffered varying fortunes since a 2001 ban on hospitals' involvement cast it into a legal grey area. See ''Womb Brokers' Rise to Meet Demand' from 2008 and 'Forced Abortions Shake up China Wombs-for-Rent Industry' from the following year on CDT. © Samuel Wade for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
One Year Later, Wukan Faces Same Challenges Posted: 25 Sep 2012 11:14 PM PDT After a minor protest in Wukan last Friday at the lack of progress made by the village's democratically elected leaders since last year's land grab demonstrations, The Wall Street Journal's Josh Chin questions whether Wukan still has value as a blueprint for political reform in China:
© Scott Greene for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
Photo: Street in Baiyang town, Baoshan, Shanghai, by Remko Tanis Posted: 25 Sep 2012 10:26 PM PDT Street in Baiyang town, Baoshan, Shanghai © Sophie Beach for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
The Rich List, “Brother Watch” and the Gini Coefficient in China Posted: 25 Sep 2012 10:21 PM PDT Hurun has released its annual list of China's richest individuals. Topping the list for the second time in three years is Zong Qinghou, founder and chairman of beverage giant Wahaha Group, who owns a fortune worth $12.6 billion. Time Magazine looks at the statistics behind the list:
A report from the Wall Street Journal says that the decline in overall wealth is due to a slowdown in the property market, where many on the list made their fortunes: While elsewhere in the world, being named on such a list might be cause for celebration, many in China prefer to keep a lower profile. With a widening wealth gap and corruption becoming major concerns of the Chinese people, China's wealthy elite often prefer not to draw attention to themselves or the sources of their income. According to a new study, they have good reason to worry. From the Financial Times Beyond BRICS Blog:
Chinese citizens are growing increasingly frustrated with blatant displays of wealth and power by even low-level local officials. After a local official in Shaanxi was shown wearing numerous luxury watches, which he wouldn't be able to afford on his salary, he became the target of netizen outrage. He was subsequently removed from his position. Responding to such public outrage, the government has launched a crackdown on corruption and conspicuous consumption. Some observers say that this has led to a slowdown in the overseas luxury market. But despite these efforts, the wealth gap is growing and so is the anger of those on the losing side. From Business Week:
Read about the "rich list" from previous years via CDT, and more about the wealth gap in Chinese society on our special Great Divide page. © Sophie Beach for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
Foxconn Plant Open, But Broader Issues Persist Posted: 25 Sep 2012 10:08 PM PDT Foxconn's Taiyuan plant reopened on Tuesday morning after closing due to a worker riot, and the company expects little impact to production as it gets back to the business of assembling electronics for the likes of Hewlett-Packard, Nintendo and Sony (Apple's iPhone is made in Foxconn factories elsewhere in China). But while Foxconn has denied that the Sunday evening melee was work-related, The New Yorker's Evan Osnos explores what it says about the broader labor situation in China:
It was largely business as usual on Tuesday, writes The Financial Times' Kathrin Hille, but observers say that more issues will likely resurface despite Foxconn's attempts to improve conditions. Her interviews revealed many of the work-related frustrations of employees at the Taiyuan plant, from the obvious (unpaid wages to lack of overtime during the upcoming National Day holiday) to the less-than-obvious:
In an interview with Gawker, China labor scholar Eli Friedman spoke at length about evolving labor conditions in China, including the ongoing shift in geographic concentration by companies such as Foxconn:
© Scott Greene for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
Does Mitt Romney Know the Difference Between Currency Manipulation and IP Infringement? Posted: 25 Sep 2012 09:58 PM PDT The old adage about beating a dead horse comes to mind at this point, but since the ad was just released yesterday, we might as well talk about it. I also feel compelled to comment since it deals, in part, with China intellectual property enforcement. Here's a link to the ad on YouTube. The point of the ad is to hit Obama on his China policy, essentially faulting the administration for being too "soft" on China. The relevant text is this:
Factcheck.org has taken a look at the ad and done a decent job pointing out its faults. The main problem here is that the ad mixes up two different issues. The "seven times" language is a reference to the U.S. Treasury Department's semi-annual report on currency manipulation. The Obama Administration has had seven opportunities, in issuing those reports, to label China a currency manipulator, and it has failed to do so, something that Romney says he would do if elected president. On the other hand, the "stealing American ideas and technology" language refers to intellectual property rights infringement. The statistics cited in the advertisement on job losses are numbers from the International Trade Commission's analysis of intellectual property infringement. Obviously the currency issue is completely different from IP, and Romney's conflation of the two is dishonest. It's the old George Will trick — just throw out a statistic from a reputable source to establish credibility, but then misuse the number. Most readers won't get past the credible source, assuming that the number means what you say it does. There are many problems with the ad, including a lot of nonsense related to the currency issue, and I've certainly talked about that before. A keyword search at China Hearsay for "currency," "RMB," "Treasury Department," or even "Chuck Schumer" will probably get you more than enough analysis on that topic. Moreover, I'm not going to even bother questioning that ITC report on IP infringement-related job numbers. I wasn't too thrilled when several Senators asked for the report and was skeptical as to its usefulness, but when it was issued, I did admit that having more economic data on IP was a positive. More relevant was my post back in June of last year, which was a response to an Op/Ed written by Tuck School professor Matthew Slaughter, who argued, based on the ITC report, that U.S. pressure on China to better enforce IP law could result in as much as 2.1 million new American jobs. For a variety of reasons, I found Slaughter's analysis to be wanting:
Let's forget for the moment that Romney is purposefully mixing up the currency and IP issues and assume that he is suggesting a more forceful stance on IP enforcement by Obama would have led to significant job creation. Even so, Romney's use of the ITC numbers runs into the same problems as Slaughter's argument. First, suggesting that China can somehow magically transform its IP enforcement system to be on par with the U.S. regime is ridiculous. If I had any reason to believe that the Romney campaign had enough of its shit together to even be making that point overtly, I'd say that they were woefully ignorant of the IP situation over here. In reality, it's more of an inference I'm making from the "logic" of the advertisement. Second, a much more overt suggestion in the ad is that Obama has been asleep at the switch when it comes to IP. As I've said many, many times over the years, IP has been, and will continue to be, among the top three U.S.-China issues. EVERY SINGLE TIME the U.S. and China sit down and talk about the bilateral relationship, IP plays a prominent role in that discussion and subsequent negotiations. Without even getting into actual disputes, WTO actions, and other ad hoc efforts, I can tell you that Romney's implication here is absolutely without merit. If you don't believe me, ask the folks at the Motion Picture Association, the Business Software Alliance, or Phrma if the U.S. government cares about IP. One last issue. In addition to conflating IP and currency valuation, the Romney ad also groups together traditional, private sector IP infringement with hacking and espionage. The ad states that China is stealing everything from "computers to fighter jets." This general statement may be true, but if you're then going to back it up by using those ITC job loss numbers, then we're once again in bullshit territory. This is not rocket science. If a Chinese company makes a widget based on patented technology owned by a U.S. company and then sells that product, then one can make the case that the U.S. company has suffered economic losses. However, if Beijing engages in espionage, stealing technology necessary to construct an advanced jet fighter, this is not a private sector loss but a national security issue. Whether China builds a fighter jet or not, it certainly won't be giving the contract to Lockheed Martin. (Real problems do exist with IP and components used in the defense industry, but that wasn't discussed in the ad.) From top to bottom, this latest China ad from the Gang that Can't Shoot Straight is extraordinarily weak. It conflates currency matters with IP, using statistics from one area to somehow justify a policy in another. Moreover, even if we give Romney the benefit of the doubt and assume that he actually is talking about IP-related job losses, we encounter more conflation, confusion and obfuscation. FUBAR © Stan for China Hearsay, 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
No Passport, No U.S. Visit For Ai Weiwei Posted: 25 Sep 2012 08:16 PM PDT In a telephone interview, Ai Weiwei has told The New York Times that he would likely miss the opening of his exhibition at the Hirshhorn Museum in Washington, as well as several other scheduled appearances in the United States next month, because Chinese authorities still have not returned his passport:
In a preview for an article which will appear in this week's Huffington iPad magazine, Gazelle Emami sat down with Ai Weiwei at his Beijing studio:
See also Ai Weiwei's take on "contemporary Chinese art", as well as recent profiles of Ai and his former protege Zhao Zhao in Smithsonian Magazine and Spiegel, respectively, all via CDT. © Scott Greene for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
Photographs Capture a Disappearing China Posted: 25 Sep 2012 10:33 AM PDT With rapid and profound economic and social changes underway in China, many aspects of day-to-day life are being transformed. Several artists have recently made efforts to document the current way of life for Chinese families as a way to preserve a lifestyle that may soon disappear. In Beijing, an exhibit of photographs by Huang Qingjun portray families outside their homes with all their worldly goods. Huang spent ten years traveling to remote areas of China to photograph the country's poorest residents, but also included members of the wealthy elite. Despite a wide disparity in the amount and worth of the possessions, almost all photographs include a television. From the BBC:
See also a previous CDT post on Huang's work. His exhibit brings to mind a show at New York's Museum of Modern Art in 2009, in which Chinese artist Song Dong displayed the complete contents of his mother's home, amassed over 50 years. In a similar effort to document a disappearing lifestyle, journalist and photographer Howard French has published a book together with writer Qiu Xiaolong of photographs, essays and poems titled, Disappearing Shanghai: Photographs and Poems of an Intimate Way of Life. As Ian Johnson writes on the New York Review of Books blog:
See more of French's photographs on his website. © Sophie Beach for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
Posted: 25 Sep 2012 08:52 AM PDT Twenty workers were killed in China's latest mining accident in Gansu. This comes just after another one of the deadliest coal mine blasts in nearly three years. AP reports:
According to AFP, officials who oversee the mine refused to comment. China's mines remain the deadliest in the world:
Aside from the accident in Gansu, China Daily reports a total of 22 miners trapped after three separate accidents:
Read more about mine safety in China, via CDT. © Melissa M. Chan for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
Posted: 25 Sep 2012 08:40 AM PDT While more companies are relying on Chinese tastes to produce luxury goods and cars, food companies, such as Nestle, have also followed suit. The Wall Street Journal reports Kellogg has now agreed to a joint venture to expand its snack business in China:
As a result of the announcement, shares of Wilmar jumped two percent. Reuters adds:
Despite the jump in share price, critics say the entrance of Kellogg's various unhealthy snacks may lead to a growing obesity rate in China. Concerns about the obesity rate in China have already been highlighted due to the rapid influx of fast food chains. From The Los Angeles Times:
© Melissa M. Chan for China Digital Times (CDT), 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
The Daily Twit – 9/25/12: Giraffes on Frickin’ Aircraft Carriers Posted: 25 Sep 2012 08:07 AM PDT I think we've gotten to the point of saturation with the China-Japan islands dispute. The Twitterati this afternoon was so bored that several of us became fascinated by this photo of a couple of giraffes being transported along a Beijing highway to God knows where. Theories include the Beijing Zoo or a new exclusive restaurant for plutocrats with exotic tastes. Then again, they could have been on their way to a new exclusive brothel for plutocrats with exotic tastes. You never can tell with the filthy rich, emphasis on the filthy. Aside from the giraffathon on Twitter today, there was one other new item out there: China's latest military toy, the aircraft carrier Liaoning. After a spot of research, I was surprised to find out that the carrier is not actually named for Liaoning Province, as I had assumed, but for the medieval Mongol word for "useless military prestige project." You learn something new every day. If you actually want to know something about the latest in maritime boondoggles, you could read one of these exciting articles: Associated Press: China says first aircraft carrier entering service, although not ready for combat or planes — Hmm. Not exactly as advertised, I guess. Without the planes and the combat readiness, the Liaoning leaves quite a lot to be desired. Xinhua: China's aircraft carrier poses no threat to world — Yeah, after the whole "no planes or combat" warnings, I kind of figured that out for myself. Guardian: China launches aircraft carrier amid rising tensions with Japan — However non-threatening China says the carrier is, the timing suggests that it is meant to be . . . well, I'm going to have to go with "warning." Interesting that China chose the name "Liaoning," the province where the shit went down in 1931 that precipitated the Japanese invasion. Just a coincidence, I'm sure, but a nifty one at that. Shit, I thought we were talking about a piece of military hardware, but just as I thought I had safely left the China-Japan spat behind me, the damn thing sucks me right back in. Very well, let's go there: LA Times: The specks of land at the center of Japan-China islands dispute — Love the headline, and the reference to the "feral, inbred goats" (the islands' only inhabitants) isn't bad either. Attitude in a major newspaper – that's refreshing. How did Barbara Demick get that language past the anti-snark detectors? Financial Times: Taiwan's fishermen enter troubled waters — Just when you thought you knew all the characters in this little drama, some Taiwanese fishermen show up. It's worse than a Russian novel. Apparently the Japanese even turned the water cannons on these guys this afternoon. No, really, I'm not making this up. Telegraph: Japanese water cannon attack on Taiwanese fishing boats over Senkaku dispute — See, I told you I wasn't making it up. I see that the Telegraph has gone with "Senkaku" in its headline (and not "Diaoyu"), which probably means that its Beijing correspondent will have problems renewing his visa next time. Oops. MarketWatch: As Japan, China argue, analysts stay hopeful — I'm glad someone is maintaining a sunny outlook. Then again, you can always find a couple of finance types to talk up the market. Any dissenting opinions out there, maybe even on the same web site? Here's one: Toyota to cut output due to China protests: report — that sounds like a negative impact to me, although it could very well end up being short-lived. Global Times: Japanese auto companies suspend marketing in China — Also not the best news. If consumer demand for Japanese products is down, and only a week ago folks were breaking and burning the stuff, sounds smart to keep a low profile for a while. Asian Lawyer: Firms Fret Over China-Japan Tensions — Another negative story, but a close read will tell you that this is mostly hand-wringing by nervous corporate lawyers. We are a jittery bunch. Cross-border deals (that include PRC/Japan) are being scrutinized perhaps, but so far, they are not being cancelled. In other news, I'll stay away from most of the empty speculation on the import of the riot/brawl/disturbance at the Foxconn plant in Taiyuan. If you read my post from yesterday, you'll remember that the whole thing made me cranky. But if you need a summary of where things stand as of today, check this out: Financial Times: Foxconn's supply chain of lost souls. Rumor has it that the Party Congress has finally been calendared for mid-October. For an interesting discussion of the Hu/Wen legacy and what lies ahead for the handover — Guardian: China's fraught succession. The China bashing in the U.S. presidential contest shows no signs of slowing down. Oh joy. Elizabeth Economy has apparently had enough of it. The Diplomat: Message to the Candidates: Talk China Policy not China Smack. I went after Romney myself today for his latest foray into misleading China blah: Mitt Romney Jumps the China Debt Shark. © Stan for China Hearsay, 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us |
Taobao Links Up With Another U.S. IP Advocacy Group Posted: 25 Sep 2012 02:28 AM PDT The political and industry savvy of China's big online players continues to impress. From the time that the video and audio file sharing sites began licensing music, films and television programs, to Baidu's various content deals, things have come a really long way in a very short period of time. For its part, Taobao inked a cooperation agreement with the powerful Motion Picture Association earlier this month, promising to work with the studios to fight copyright piracy, and now the e-commerce platform has signed an MOU with one of the better known anti-counterfeiting groups.
Although I used to attend some of their conferences, I haven't had any direct contact with IACC for years. As I recall, it is a solid group that does good advocacy work. It is not in the same league as MPAA in terms of sheer political power, but it has a very good profile in IP circles, and particularly in D.C. where it is headquartered. This kind of partnering up is really smart. Taobao can take advantage of the valuable network of contacts via these groups. Moreover, it can let these groups educate them not only on new IP developments in different countries, but also how to successfully navigate the corridors of power in places like D.C. I assume Taobao already sends representatives and in-house legal folks to IACC events and has used these conferences to learn how other e-commerce companies are solving their IP problems. Although Chinese companies like Taobao and Baidu are not engaged in significant outward investment in places like the U.S., this type of model, partnering with strong, politically connected organizations, should be emulated as much as possible by other Chinese firms moving overseas. Doing so will allow them to avoid a lot of mistakes and wasted resources. © Stan for China Hearsay, 2012. | Permalink | 2 comments | Add to del.icio.us |
You are subscribed to email updates from Update » Links » China 优文 Cream To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
Comments