Blogs » Politics » Bo Xilai Trial May, May Not Start Monday

Blogs » Politics » Bo Xilai Trial May, May Not Start Monday


Bo Xilai Trial May, May Not Start Monday

Posted: 25 Jan 2013 04:20 PM PST

The South China Morning Post has poured lukewarm water on earlier reports, originating in state media, that the trial of fallen Chongqing Party Chief Bo Xilai will begin on Monday.

When asked by reporters, a spokesman for Intermediate Court said: "Are you asking about case? This is rumour, we have never received this case."

The China-run Ta Kung Pao newspaper said on its website that Bo's trial would start on Monday in the southern city of Guiyang and last three days. It cited "well-informed Beijing sources", but gave no details.

[…] One of Bo's lawyers, , declined to comment when reached by telephone. Reporters were unable to reach his second lawyer, , despite repeated telephone calls.

[…] Li Zhuang, a Beijing lawyer who opposed Wang Lijun and Bo for mounting a sweeping crackdown on foes in the name of fighting organised crime, said he also thought it was possible for a Monday hearing.

"I would only say it's possible, though not totally certain," Li said.

Comments about Bo's likely fate from Li Jingtian, executive vice president of the , were similarly inconclusive. From Tom Orlik and Gerard Baker at The Wall Street Journal:

"We have always had severe punishment for corrupt officials," Mr. Li said during the interview at the in on Wednesday, in response to a question about the fate of Mr. Bo. Such interviews are rare for senior party officials.

He cited the examples of Liu Qingshan and Zhang Zishan, two leaders in the party's early days who were executed in the 1950s following accusations of embezzlement and other crimes in one of the party's first anticorruption campaigns.

[…] Mr. Li's comments don't mean Mr. Bo is likely to face if found guilty. While he cited the case of another —that of Cheng Kejie, a former top legislator who was executed in 2000—he also cited the case of , a former party chief of Beijing convicted on charges in 1998 but released from on medical parole in 2006. He also named Chen Liangyu, the former party secretary of Shanghai who was dismissed in 2006 and later sentenced to 18 years in on charges.

See more on the Bo case to date, some of it more certain than the above, via CDT.


© Samuel Wade for China Digital Times (CDT), 2013. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Download Tools to Circumvent the Great Firewall

Ban on Nu River Dams Washed Away

Posted: 25 Jan 2013 03:28 PM PST

China's State Council has announced plans to resume hydropower development on the Nu (Salween), Lancang (Mekong) and Jinsha (a tributary of the Yangtze) rivers. Outgoing premier had repeatedly intervened to block damming of the Nu, and the plans have therefore been seen as a sign of his waning influence. From Li Jing at the South China Morning Post:

"This is really shocking," said Li Bo, a director at Friends of Nature, a leading environmental group. "There were signs during the past year that mega were staging a comeback after being put on hold for years, but I'm still shocked by the lack of transparency in the decision-making process behind this.

"If implemented, these projects could destroy the baseline for ecological security, which completely goes against a promise highlighted by the new leadership to preserve a beautiful homeland for our future generations."

[…] Under mainland law, however, each of the projects is still subject to environmental impact reviews before construction starts.In 2005, Premier Wen, a geologist by training, shelved plans to build 13 dams on the Unesco-protected , one of the country's last free-flowing rivers. Wen told authorities to "widely heed opinions, expound on [the plan] thoroughly and make prudent decisions". At least four of the dams have been revived in the new plan.

Though both Li and International Rivers' Peter Bosshard described the news as "shocking", there were signs that Wen's protection might be slipping in February 2011, when state media reported that damming would resume.

One major concern over the new dams is the south-west's high level of seismic activity. Reservoirs can increase the risk of earthquakes and landslides: a Probe International study released in December found that the 2008 Sichuan earthquake which killed some 80,000 people was likely caused by the weight of water behind the Zipingpu dam.

For more details on the Nu, Lancang and Jinsha see International Rivers, as well as Anchalee Kongrut's overview of damming along the Lancang/Mekong at Economic Observer.


© Samuel Wade for China Digital Times (CDT), 2013. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: , , , , , , ,
Download Tools to Circumvent the Great Firewall

China and Japan Move to Cool Down Diaoyu Dispute

Posted: 25 Jan 2013 03:15 PM PST

China Daily reports on CCP general secretary Xi Jinping's recent meeting with a Japanese envoy in Beijing, in which standing tensions over the were indirectly addressed:

on Friday said China and should address "sensitive" issues between the two countries effectively and in a timely manner.

Xi, general secretary of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee, made the remarks as he met with Natsuo Yamaguchi, leader of the New Komeito party, on Friday morning. The New Komeito party is the smaller of Japan's two ruling parties.

Yamaguchi, who arrived in Beijing on Tuesday, is the first senior member of Japan's ruling bloc to travel to China since the Japanese government announced it would "purchase" part of the Diaoyu Islands in September, a move that soured bilateral relations.

"China's stance on the Diaoyu Islands is consistent and clear," Xi said, urging the Japanese side to respect history as well as reality and make joint efforts with China to seek effective methods for appropriately controlling and resolving problems through dialogue and consultation.

While the China Daily report chose to quote Xi emphasizing consistency in China's stance on the islands, New York Times coverage notes that the leader's comments were soft when compared to previous official statements:

China's new leader, Xi Jinping, offered Japan a conciliatory tone during a meeting with a senior Japanese politician on Friday in an apparent effort to reduce the escalating tensions between the two countries over islands in the East China Sea.

In some of his first remarks on China's foreign policy since becoming secretary general of the Communist Party, Mr. Xi told the Japanese lawmaker, Natsuo Yamaguchi, "The Chinese government remains committed to China-Japan relations," according to an account provided by China's Foreign Ministry.

Mr. Xi urged both sides to "look at the larger picture" and "push relations forward," the Foreign Ministry said, language markedly more restrained than the combative exhortations from military officials and state-run media since the dispute over the islands erupted four months ago.

Natsuo Yamaguchi, the envoy who met with Xi, represented Japan's new coalition government led by Prime Minister Shinzō Abe, a man whose "hawkish" campaign statements concerning the Diaoyu Islands were a cause for concern in China. Japanese coverage of the meeting notes that Yamaguchi delivered a letter on Abe's behalf requesting a face-to-face meeting between the two leaders, and that Xi responded agreeably. From The Asahi Shimbun:

During their hour-long discussion, Yamaguchi handed Xi a letter from Prime Minister Shinzo Abe requesting a summit meeting between the two new heads of government.

"I will seriously consider a high-level dialogue," Xi responded. "To do so, arranging the proper environment is of vital importance."

Upon returning to Tokyo, Yamaguchi expressed optimism about an eventual resolution to the territorial dispute. Reuters reports:

Japan takes a broad view of the issue and believes tensions can be resolved between the two countries, he told reporters before returning to Tokyo after a four-day visit.

"Japan wishes to pursue ties with China while looking at the big picture," Yamaguchi said he told Xi, who is set to take over as China's president in March.

"I firmly believe our differences with China can be resolved," Yamaguchi said, adding that he did not directly discuss the islands issue with Xi.

"We agreed that it is important to continue dialogue with the aim of holding a Japan-China summit between the two leaders," he added, though no specific details were given. "Secretary Xi said he will seriously consider a high-level dialogue with Japan."

Another report from Reuters tells of an imminent U.N. investigation into the validity of China's claims on the group of islands:

The United Nations is planning to consider later this year the scientific validity of a claim by China that a group of disputed islands in the East China Sea are part of its territory, although Japan says the world body should not be involved.

It was not immediately clear if the U.N. involvement would increase the likelihood the China-Japan dispute would be resolved peacefully. But launching an international legal process that should yield a neutral scientific opinion could reduce the temperature for now in Beijing's spat with Tokyo.

In a submission to the U.N. Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, China says the continental shelf in the East China Sea is a natural prolongation of China's land territory and that it includes the disputed islands.

As China and Japan appear to be softening their rhetoric, – another claimant to sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands – is reasserting its claims. The Asahi Shimbun reports on confrontation between the Japanese Coast Guard and a fishing boat full of Taiwanese activists on January 24:

The fishing boat, accompanied by four Taiwanese cutters, entered the contiguous zone off Japan's territorial waters around the islands, but was chased off by the Japan Coast Guard using a water cannon. The uninhabited islands, called Diaoyutai in Taiwan, are effectively administered by Japan but are claimed by both Taiwan and China.

[...]The "Chinese Association for Protecting the Diaoyutais," which sent the fishing boat, is a group of political activists, four of whom hold fishery certificates. Taiwan's Coast Guard Administration said there was no reason to block the boat from leaving port, because the action was lawful.

[...]A Taiwanese Foreign Ministry source indicated the authorities approved the latest departure because the Ma administration was eager to assert Taiwan's role and presence at a time when the United States, Japan's ally, and China have come to loggerheads over the Senkakus issue.

"We have to assert ourselves whenever China takes a strong stand," the ministry source said.

But Taipei has also been careful not to give the impression, either at home or abroad, that China and Taiwan are joining hands over the Senkakus dispute.


© josh rudolph for China Digital Times (CDT), 2013. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: , , , , , , ,
Download Tools to Circumvent the Great Firewall

Fines for Food Waste and the “Clean Plate Campaign”

Posted: 25 Jan 2013 02:31 PM PST

, an agricultural scientist at the Chinese Academy of Engineering and the "father of hybrid rice", has publicly endorsed the implementation of fines for wasted food. Yuan, famous for developing the first varieties of high-yield hybrid rice in the 70s, shared last year's Confucius Peace Prize with former UN secretary general Kofi Annan, after coming in just shy of Vladimir Putin in 2011. The South China Morning Post reports:

"I suggest the government prohibit wasting food by treating it as a kind of crime and shameful behaviour," he said. "Many banquets I have attended offered dozens of different dishes to the guests, who only briefly tasted each dish and then threw them away. The authorities should fine them."

Yuan said squandering food was unforgivable, especially because China had to pull out all stops to provide enough food for its 1.3 billion people due to its limited arable land. "It was difficult to improve rice's output, but after we did we found the food was being wasted," he said.

China News Service has reported that the country's leftover food could feed more than 200 million people a year. The State Council Leading Group Office of Poverty Alleviation and Development said about 128 million people were living below the official poverty line in 2011.

Meanwhile, 28 million undergraduates studying at mainland universities throw away enough food every year to feed 10 million people, according to research by China Agricultural University.

The abundance of wasted food in China – a country where some are struggling even to meet their nutritional needs – has prompted an online campaign against food squandering, as pointed out by a recent tweet from Xinhua. Below are two images circulating the Weibosphere as part of the "clean plate campaign":

Today, leave no leftovers

It starts with me

I have a "clean plate"

今天不剩饭

从我做起

我,是 "光盘"

@LongjiangGourmet "Clean Plate" movement starts with me

@龙江美食 "光盘" 行动, 从我做起

Every year, China's restaurant industry throws out enough food to feed 200 million people!

我国餐饮业每年倒掉的饭菜相当于两亿多人一年的粮!

China has tens of millions of people in need of food and clothing!

中国还有数千万人口处于温饱线之下!

Recovering just 5% of wasted food could feed four million people!

只要回收5%被丢弃的食品, 就能养活400万饥民!

Guarding our savory civilization starts with me. I won't food anymore!

守护舌尖上的文明,从我做起,以后不剩饭!


© josh rudolph for China Digital Times (CDT), 2013. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: , , , ,
Download Tools to Circumvent the Great Firewall

Presidential Inbox: Integrating Global Health Into the Pivot Strategy

Posted: 25 Jan 2013 01:50 PM PST

U.S. President Obama is followed by his staff as he leaves the Plenary session of the 21st ASEAN and East Asia summit in Phnom Penh (Damir Sagolj/Courtesy Reuters).

Mr. President, as you begin your second term, you and your Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping both face the challenge of building a mature and mutually beneficial bilateral relationship.  There is no need to belabor the strategic importance of the Sino-American relations for the United States.  Indeed, one may argue that it is precisely the strategic dynamics driven by China's rise that led to your critical decision to pivot to Asia.

While we are told that a critical element of the U.S. pivot strategy is to nurture partnerships to address important common challenges, our rebalancing efforts thus far have focused almost solely on security and trade.  They are certainly crucial in promoting U.S. economic growth and regional stability, but our relationship with China and other Asian countries has become so multifaceted and complex that other issues, like health and the environment, challenge us to promote jointly the welfare of people in the Asia-Pacific region, which still accounts for a majority of the global disease burden.  As a result of the epidemiological transition, non-communicable diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes are increasingly becoming the dominant cause of mortality.  China, which has surpassed India to become the world's diabetes capital, also accounts for 20 percent of the world's total cancer-caused deaths.  By increasing individual and household impoverishment and hindering socioeconomic development, the non-communicable diseases are a major cause of poverty and an urgent development challenge in the region.

In addition to the rising threat of non-communicable diseases, the Asia-Pacific region also faces growing health security threats.  With extensive animal trade and cross-border human movement, the region remains a center of global concern for the emergence of pandemic influenza or a SARS-type novel, zoonotic respiratory virus.  The lowered barriers to entry and reduced costs of bioengineering only increase the risks of accidental or intentional release of dangerous pathogens. In addition, there has been an increase in drug-resistant infections (e.g., artemisinin-resistant malaria and drug-resistant tuberculosis) and vector-borne diseases including dengue and Japanese encephalitis. These infectious diseases threaten U.S. military forces in the region, disturb international trade and travel, and even undermine regional stability.  As you and Senator Lugar wrote in a 2005 New York Times op-ed, a major disease "outbreak could cause millions of deaths, destabilize Southeast Asia…and threaten the security of governments around the world."  Your concern was recently echoed by Mr. Xi Jinping, who said, "at present, world health problems are in close relationship with international issues, including politics, economy and social development, and have an impact on international relations and foreign policies."

Building an enhanced global health agenda into the pivot strategy would contribute to a win-win outcome, which is precisely what Beijing hopes to achieve in what it calls a "new major country relationship." As a Chinese scholar said, the ability to achieve such a relationship depends, among others, on how the two countries "develop their potential" for win-win cooperation.  Health is an area that is politically neutral and about which each side feels strongly.  Indeed, demographic and epidemiological transition and China's move toward universal health coverage not only generated huge demand for more and better healthcare, but also ushered in forces supporting private and overseas investment in a sector that is traditionally monopolized by government actors.  Given the U.S. comparative advantage in pharmaceutical-related research and development as well as healthcare management and service quality, health system transition in China  would generate more business opportunities for U.S. companies and contribute to the narrowing trade deficit with China.  Equally important, tackling a common health challenge helps countries in the region build trust and reduce tensions around more contentious policy issues such as territorial dispute.  While substantial cooperation over health may provide Beijing an additional reason to focus more on domestic welfare and internal transition, improved U.S.-China relations contributes to regional security, which helps strengthen the United States' position in the region.

In your first term, Mr. President, your administration was active in conducting health diplomacy by proposing a set of innovative guiding principles and objectives as well as launching new initiatives.  While the results of these programs were mixed, the inclusion of an enhanced global health agenda within the pivot strategy would serve to strengthen your leadership in this area and the administration's ability to effectively handle health diplomacy.  When integrated into the pivot strategy, such an agenda would include:

  1. Actively engaging China's healthcare sector.  While promoting opportunities for U.S. biopharmaceutical firms, hospital groups, and insurance companies to do business with China, we should also demonstrate our willingness to work with China to address issues of immediate concern to the Chinese people, including their ability to access effective and affordable medicines.
  2. Increase U.S.-China military-to-military exchange on health issues, including humanitarian assistance and disease surveillance.  A working relationship, for example, could be established between Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center and the Chinese PLA Center for Disease Control and Prevention.
  3. Jointly launch several major initiatives aimed at strengthening the health system in the region.  Potential areas of cooperation include control of artemisinin-resistant malaria, dual-use research dilemma, and prevention and control of non-communicable diseases.  Doing so is in both countries' enlightened self-interest because it not only contributes to regional security and development but also allows each side to benefit from improved soft power status.
  4. Continue to encourage Beijing to shoulder more global health responsibilities while exploring with it the best practices and institutional requirements of development assistance for heath.

Mr. President, since Beijing is not used to making any major initiatives on the global health front, you should feel free to raise these issues with Mr. Xi at the next summit.  Once you both reach an understanding on these issues, the Strategic & Economic Dialogue would be an ideal venue for moving this agenda forward.  Depending on the issue areas, several government working groups can be established, including officials from the State Department, U.S. Agency for International Development, Department of Health and Human Services, Defense Department, and the Food and Drug Administration in the United States, and the Ministry of Commerce, Ministry of Health, the State Food and Drug Administration, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and PLA General Logistics in China.

Forty years ago, when the first batch of American health workers were allowed to visit China, Milo Leavitt, then director of the Fogarty International Center, noted in Medicine and Public Health in the People's Republic of China that "for those who believe that the universal desire for health and relief from disease and suffering may be the strongest key to peace and international cooperation, it is significant and heartening to observe that physicians were among the first groups granted permission to visit the People's Republic of China." If cooperation over health contributed to the opening of China in the early 1970s, now it can and should play a much larger role in building strategic trust and contributing to the success of your pivot strategy.  We look forward to your leadership in shaping this global health agenda.

Photo: Majong Shop, by Land of no cheese

Posted: 25 Jan 2013 12:18 PM PST

Ministry of Truth: Ban on Live Global Dialogue

Posted: 25 Jan 2013 12:10 PM PST

The following instructions, issued to the media by central government authorities, have been leaked and distributed online. Chinese journalists and bloggers often refer to these instructions as "."

Central Department: On January 29, U.S. Secretary of State will hold a one-hour, live global dialogue in Washington via video conference. No media may participate or report on it. (January 25, 2013)

中宣部:1月29日美国国务卿希拉里将在华盛顿通过视频连线进行一小时的大型全球现场对话会,各媒体对此不参与、不报道。

CDT has collected the selections we translate here from a variety of sources and has checked them against official Chinese media reports to confirm their implementation.

Since directives are sometimes communicated orally to journalists and editors, who then leak them online, the wording published here may not be exact. The original publication date on CDT Chinese is noted after the directives; the date given may indicate when the directive was leaked, rather than when it was issued. CDT does its utmost to verify dates and wording, but also takes precautions to protect the source.


© Anne.Henochowicz for China Digital Times (CDT), 2013. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: , , , , , , ,
Download Tools to Circumvent the Great Firewall

Presidential Inbox: A Strategy to Counter North Korea’s Nuclear Defiance

Posted: 25 Jan 2013 11:30 AM PST

U.S. President Obama speaks during a joint news conference with South Korea's President Lee at the Blue House in Seoul. (Yuriko Nakao/courtesy Reuters)

Mr. President, your first administration played "small ball" with North Korea. The policy of "strategic patience" succeeded in weathering North Korean provocations and limited exposure to the political risks that would have accompanied a high profile effort to address North Korea's nuclear development.  However, the crime and punishment approach to North Korea's 2009 satellite launch and nuclear test through UN Security Council sanctions, statements, and resolutions has failed to stop North Korea's growing nuclear and long-range delivery capabilities.

Your secretary of defense warned that North Korea is developing a missile capability that would eventually be able to reach the United States and has acquired road-mobile transportation vehicles that make such missiles easier to hide and harder to take out. Several rounds of low-key dialogue in 2011 and 2012 resulted in the ill-fated Leap Day agreement that again failed to restrain North Korean long-range rocket launches; UN condemnation and sanctions appear to have only fueled North Korean defiance.  North Korea has responded to the latest UN resolution with threats to conduct further satellites, long-range rockets, and "a nuclear test of higher level."  If North Korea conducts a third nuclear test, more sanctions and more resolutions seem inevitable, but will likely be equally feckless in restraining North Korea from its current course.  Given steady North Korean progress in developing its missile and nuclear programs, your administration should pursue a more active strategy designed to shape North Korea's environment. This approach should include the following steps:

1)      Redouble efforts to cut off North Korea's remaining potential nuclear customers

You presided over a shrinking North Korean customer base during your first term as a result of political transitions in Libya and Myanmar.  But North Korea forged an MOU with Iran last year on scientific and technical cooperation and the two countries continue to exchange technical personnel.  Your administration should make it a priority to cut this link through stricter implementation of UN Security Council resolutions and enhanced intervention to thwart North Korean-Iranian cooperation.

2)      Forge a unified policy approach with South Korea

Your first administration saw unprecedented policy coordination with South Korea led by your close personal relationship with outgoing South Korean president Lee Myung-bak.  It will be necessary for you to develop an equally close relationship with his successor Park Geun-hye to forge a unified policy approach that embeds denuclearization into a broader diplomatic and political effort designed to foster North Korea's peaceful integration into the region. This will mean active U.S. support for South Korean efforts to build practical cooperation with Russia and China on North Korea-related transport and energy projects.

3)      Together with South Korea, discuss peninsular geostrategy, and not just denuclearization, with  China

First term efforts to forge cooperation with China on North Korea foundered in part because the United States and China were talking past each other on North Korea.  China's focus on peninsular stability was a function of a geostrategic view of the peninsula as a zero-sum competition for influence between China and the United States, while Washington talked denuclearization without sufficient attention to China's geostrategic concerns.  President-elect Park Geun-hye has stressed the importance of strong Sino-U.S. cooperation, wants to stabilize inter-Korean relations, and has advocated establishing a China-U.S.-ROK dialogue.  Embracing this approach would provide an improved basis for forging trilateral cooperation measures designed to help North Korea, rather than allowing divisions for North Korea to exploit.

4)      Encourage More North Koreans to Experience Reality Outside the Country

North Korea's publicly stated terms for negotiation of a new relationship with the United States are unrealistic.  Denuclearization will remain an essential precondition for normalization of U.S.-DPRK relations. But this does not mean that North Koreans should be blocked from participating in non-governmental cultural and educational exchanges in the United States or with other countries.  In fact, the United States should facilitate opportunities for such exchange with the hope that North Korean educational experiences will sow the seeds of North Korea's transformation and build confidence between the two peoples.  It also means continued advocacy for international measures to hold North Korea to account for its atrocious human rights record, which fails to meet minimally acceptable international standards.  Ultimately, the impetus for breaking the impasse in U.S.-DPRK relations and achieving North Korea's regional integration will likely come not from governments, but from the North Korean people themselves.

Chinese Graduates Say No Thanks to Factory Jobs

Posted: 25 Jan 2013 10:52 AM PST

China now produces eight million new college each year, four times as many as ten years ago. The job market, however, has not adjusted accordingly. While the graduate glut sharpens competition for jobs even as it drives down wages, the educated unemployed are put off plentiful factory jobs by heightened expectations, lack of prestige, and fear of damage to long-term career prospects. The resulting frustration may prove a long-term challenge to social stability, writes Keith Bradsher at The New York Times:

Wang Zengsong is desperate for a steady job. He has been unemployed for most of the three years since he graduated from a community college here after growing up on a rice farm. Mr. Wang, 25, has worked only several months at a time in low-paying jobs, once as a shopping mall guard, another time as a restaurant waiter and most recently as an office building security guard.

[…] "I have never and will never consider a factory job — what's the point of sitting there hour after hour, doing repetitive work?" he asked.

Millions of recent college graduates in China like Mr. Wang are asking the same question. A result is an anomaly: Jobs go begging in factories while many educated young workers are unemployed or underemployed. A national survey of urban residents, released this winter by a Chinese university, showed that among people in their early 20s, those with a college degree were four times as likely to be unemployed as those with only an elementary school education.

See more about China's "ant tribe" of un- or underemployed graduates via CDT.


© Samuel Wade for China Digital Times (CDT), 2013. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: , , , , , ,
Download Tools to Circumvent the Great Firewall

John Kerry Calls for Stronger Partnership with China

Posted: 25 Jan 2013 09:48 AM PST

At his Senate confirmation hearings, , who is expected to be confirmed as U.S. Secretary of State, outlined his expectations for the U.S.-China relationship, acknowledging that while problems persist, he hopes to see more cooperation on a number of global issues. From UPI:

Kerry said he "could envision a way in which China could play a much more significant role as a partner in any number of efforts globally. … We will be competitors in the economic marketplace, but shouldn't be viewed as adversaries in some way that diminishes our ability to cooperate in a number of things.

"China is cooperating with us now on Iran. I think there might be more we could perhaps do with respect to North Korea. There could be more we could do in other parts of the Far East. And hopefully, we can build those relationships that will further that transformation.

Kerry also noted China's role in Africa as an area where the U.S. needs to step up efforts to compete. From the same article:

"Now with respect to China and Africa, China is all over Africa — I mean, all over Africa. And they're buying up long-term contracts on minerals, on … you name it," Kerry said. "And there're some places where we're not in the game, folks. And I hate to say it. And we got to get in. But it takes a little bit of resourcing. Believe me, somebody's paying for those folks to be over there. And somebody's investing in their investment of time.

The Chinese government, for its part, responded favorably to Kerry's comments. From a Xinhua article:

"The Chinese side places great importance on developing China-," [Foreign Ministry spokesperson] Hong told a regular press conference.

"We are ready to work with the U.S. side to further advance the development of the China-U.S. cooperative partnership and explore the development of a new relationship between major powers," Hong said.

[...] In response to Kerry's comments, Hong said the Asia-Pacific region is where China and the U.S. have the closest convergence of interests and the most frequent interactions.

"China and the United States should jointly play a constructive role in maintaining peace, stability and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region," Hong said.

Kerry's predecessor, Hillary Clinton, discussed U.S.-China relations from a business perspective in an interview with BloombergBusinessweek. Responding to a question about what leverage the U.S. has in fighting intellectual property theft by China – an issue that Kerry noted was a remaining hurdle in the relationship – Clinton said:

We have leverage in opening our markets or not. Permitting foreign direct investment or not. Having a relationship that is economically robust within a broader strategic relationship. Which gives validation to Chinese business that is of benefit to them as they go around selling in the world. So some of it is very tangible. Like, OK, you're going do that to us, then we're going to do that to you. You know, you slap tariffs on our steel, we're going to slap tariffs on your steel.

[BloombergBusinessweek]: Checkmate.

Yeah, checkmate. And is that good for anybody? Or let's figure out how we are going to have rules that we both live by. This is always a work in progress. We have a mature, developed economy that has evolved over 150 years. And we still are working out issues that are yet to be resolved. So when you think about how far China has come in such a short period of time, and as you rightly point out, having every incentive to take advantage of whatever they can for their own benefit, I don't hold that against them. I just hold it against us if we're not out there pushing back.

Read more about Hillary Clinton and U.S.-China relations, via CDT.


© Sophie Beach for China Digital Times (CDT), 2013. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: , , , , ,
Download Tools to Circumvent the Great Firewall

Redefining the Meaning of “Chinese”

Posted: 25 Jan 2013 09:48 AM PST

Didi Kirsten Tatlow quotes specialist Mark Harrison's suggestions that China could learn from Taiwan in building a more inclusive Chinese identity. From the New York Times:

Because what China cannot seem to do — and probably not for a long time yet — is this: build a broadly attractive definition of what it means to be "Chinese" for all its various ethnic groups, including the increasingly restive Tibetans and Uighurs, and thereby genuinely bring together the different voices within its borders, Dr. Harrison said.

Tied to that: It cannot, for now, show the world that a Chinese society can be open, tolerant and democratic. But Taiwan can.

[...] "For the Chinese, being Chinese is an objective fact. You can't become Chinese. You are born it. But for the Taiwanese there's the possibility of choosing to be Taiwanese," a process that allows meaningful cultural differences while being a part of the nation, he said.

[...] "What Taiwan says is that there is nothing immutable about being Chinese, and there are a lot of other ways of thinking about being Chinese that are beyond the nationalism of the People's Republic of China," Dr. Harrison said. That model could eventually convince ethnic minorities that they are truly equal members of the Chinese state.

See more on Taiwan relations via CDT.


© Mengyu Dong for China Digital Times (CDT), 2013. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: , , , ,
Download Tools to Circumvent the Great Firewall

Censorship Vault: Sorry for the Trouble

Posted: 25 Jan 2013 09:40 AM PST

In partnership with the China Copyright and Media blog, CDT is adding the "" series to the Censorship Vault. These directives were originally published on Canyu.org (Participate) and date from 2005 to 2007. According to Canyu, the directives were issued by the Beijing Municipal Network Management Office and the State Council Internet management departments and provided to to Canyu by insiders. China Copyright and Media has not verified the source.

The translations are by Rogier Creemers of China Copyright and Media.

29 August 2007, 18:58:02

Reporting requirements concerning the readjustment of the positions of comrade Jin Renqing: Websites are to use Xinhua information without exception, and may not reprint reports from any other source; do not set up special subjects, do not issue it on the main page of websites and the important news section of the news centre, it may be issued in the domestic section, let it remain there until 12:00 in the evening; strictly manage trackers, examine all posts before publishing, quantities may not exceed 50, firmly delete all harmful information seizing upon the opportunity to attack Party and state leaders, attack our country's political system, social system, and the Party's cadre system; forum, blogs, instant messaging, post bars, and other interactive segments are not to actively set up topics, information, and comments from foreign websites may not be posted; all search engines will direct searches for "Jin Renqing" to news websites, do not set up related searches.

30 August 2007, 07:42:43

All Websites: Please do not reprint or report today's report in the 14th edition of the Beijing Daily, "Capital's First Social Insurance Case." Interactive segments are not to discuss this, as soon as this is discovered, delete it immediately. Thanks for the cooperation!

30 August 2007, 18:43:27

All websites are requested to find today's instructions (six portals have already been notified), these must be transmitted to the interactive segments and the next shift's personnel. Thanks, everyone!

Propaganda Instructions Concerning "Capital's First Social Insurance Corruption Case"

All Websites: Please do not reprint or report today's report in the 14th edition of the Beijing Daily, "Capital's First Social Insurance Corruption Case." Interactive segments are not to discuss this, as soon as this is discovered, delete it immediately. Thanks for the cooperation.

30 August 2007, 22:37:10

All Websites: Concerning information on changes in the posts of four ministers today, please abide by yesterday's propaganda instructions, successively remove this to the back stage, everyone must be clear about this, deal with this on the back stage, do not simply control positions… Complete implementation before two o'clock, thanks for cooperation! That is if we click on any one channel, we cannot see it, ha….

Also, some websites have asked whether only information concerning Jin Renqing must be removed, we have considered that doing this may very well give rise to suspicion, therefore, the appointment or dismissal of all ministers is required to be removed to the back stage before 12 o'clock… sorry for the trouble!

All portal websites are especially requested to pay attention to their own finance and economics channels… it is absolutely necessary to correctly implement this. All finance and economics-type websites are also requested to cooperate well. Sorry for the trouble!

30 August 2007, 23:20:26

Leaders have said, for the moment, this is to be done…

All Websites: The notice of a moment ago that information on changes in positions of four ministers is to be removed to the backstage, is now ordered as being void, please wait for the newest notice tomorrow.

31 August 2007, 13:41:24, Huang Jing

All Websites: Everyone is requested to immediately deal with information that has not been deleted or has not yet been responded to on the reporting platform for unlawful or harmful information.

31 August 2007, 14:11:51

All search engines are to direct searches for "Jin Renqing" to news websites, do not set up related searches.

31 August 2007, 16:51:12

Second Level: Please search for and delete the text "China-India Border Negotiation Result Emerges–China's Territorial Surface Area Becomes 9.51 Million Square Kilometers (Pictures)," this test is false information. Interactive segments are not to disseminate or discuss this.

All search engines will ensure the title of this article is screened and set up the following keywords for screening, and ensure no search results in the entire websites: "China-India border negotiation result," "9.51 million square kilometers."

31 August 2007, Chen Hua

Everyone: Please screen searchers for the following three batches of keywords, ensure there are no results and related searches on the entire website, finish this before 11:00 this evening. First batch: Shandong Energy privatization, privatization Shandong Energy, Shandong Energy privatization Liu Zhenya, Liu Zhenya Shandong Energy privatization, Liu Zhenya Shandong Energy, Shandong Energy Liu Zhenya, Shandong Energy Group privatization; direct all search results for Liu Zhenya to news websites. Second batch: Guangdong Electric salaries, Guangdong salary slips, Electric salary slips, Electric system salaries, looking at salary slips in the Electric systems, salary Guangdong Electric, looking at Guangdong salaries, Guangdong Electricity Supply Bureau salaries, Shenzhen Electricity Bureau salaries, Foshan Electricity Bureau salaries, Dongguan Electricity Supply salaries. Third batch: a bit of sunshine on salaries scares you, Guangdong Electric system salaries, Guangdong Electricity Supply Bureau salaries, sunshine on salaries scares you, complete salary situation of the second quarter, salaries that frighten you, sunshine salaries Guangdong. That's it, respond, sorry for everyone's trouble.

2007年8月北京网管办发出的禁令(四)

2007-08-29 18:58:02

关于金人庆同志职务调整的报道要求;网站一律采用新华社消息,不得转载其他任何来源的报道;不设专题,不发网站首页和新闻中心要闻区,可发国内,停 留至当晚12:00;跟帖严格管理,逐条先审后发,数量不超过50条,坚决删除借机攻击党和国家领导人,攻击我国政治制度、社会制度和党的干部制度的有害 信息;论坛、博客、即时通讯和贴吧等互动环节不主动设置议题,不得贴发境外网站消息和评论;各搜索将"金人庆"搜索指向新闻站点,不设相关。

2007-08-30 07:42:43

各网:今天北京日报14版报道的:"京城首起社保基金贪污案",请不要转载报道。互动环节不讨论,一经发现,立即删除.谢谢合作!

2007-08-30 18:43:27

请各网站查收今日宣传提示(六门户已经通知过),务必传达给互动环节及交接班人员。谢谢各位!

关于"京城首起社保基金贪污案"的宣传提示

各网:今天北京日报14版报道的:"京城首起社保基金贪污案",请不要转载报道 互动环节不讨论,一经发现,立即删除.谢谢合作

2007-08-30 22:37:10

各网:关于今日四部部长任职变动的消息,请遵照昨日的宣传提示,陆续撤入后台,各位一定要明确,是撤后台处理哟,不是简单的调控位置…… 2点之前执行完毕 谢谢合作!就是我们点进任何一个频道,都不能看见,哈……

还有,有网站提到了是否只撤除金人庆的相关消息,我们考虑到如何这样做很可能引起更多的猜忌,所以各部部长的任免消息都要求于12时前撤入后台……辛苦各位了!

尤其是请各门户网站注意自己的财经频道……一定要准确执行。也请各财经类网站多多配合。辛苦!

2007-08-30 23:20:26

领导说了,暂时就这样放置吧……

各网:刚刚通知四部长任职变动的消息撤后台,现在该条指令失效,请等待明天的最新通知

2007-08-31 13:41:24 黄婧

各网:请大家立即处理一下违法和不良信息举报平台里没有删除和没有回复的信息.

2007-08-31 14:11:51

各搜索将"金人庆"搜索指向新闻站点,不设相关。

2007年8月31日 16:51:12

二级:请查找删除《中印边界谈判结果已浮现 中国陆地面积已变为951万平方公里(图)》一文,此文为虚假消息。互动环节不传播、不讨论。
各搜索将文章题目设屏蔽并将下列词设屏蔽,全站无结果:"中印边界谈判结果"、"951万平方公里"。

2007年8月31日 陈华:

各位,请将下列三批词搜索设屏蔽,全站无结果不设相关,今晚11:00前搞定。第一批:鲁能私有化,私有化鲁能,鲁能私有化刘振亚,刘振亚鲁能私有 化,刘振亚鲁能,鲁能刘振亚,鲁能集团私有化;将刘振亚的搜索全站指向新闻站点。第二批:广东电力工资,广东工资单,电力工资单,电力系统工资,看电力系 统工资单,工资广东电力,看广东工资,广州供电局工资,深圳供电局工资,佛山供电局工资,东莞供电局工资。第三批:晒晒工资吓死你,广东电力系统工资单, 广东供电局工资,晒工资吓死你,第二季度全部工资情况,吓死你工资,晒工资广东。齐了,回复,各位辛苦。

These translated directives were first posted by Rogier Creemers on China Copyright and Media on January 25, 2013 (here). This post is the 60th in the series.


© Anne.Henochowicz for China Digital Times (CDT), 2013. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: , , , , , ,
Download Tools to Circumvent the Great Firewall

“Waking Up From the Beijing Dream”: An Online Account of Love, Corruption, and Unwritten Rules

Posted: 25 Jan 2013 08:51 AM PST

(2493™/Flickr)

When Chinese news agency Xinhua announced the dismissal of Yi Junqing, head of the Communist Party's Central Compilation and Translation Bureau, the story appeared to fall neatly into a pattern of corruption exposes that followed China's 18th Party Congress, where the next generation of the country's leaders was recently chosen. It has the mistress-money-power combination that has become a hallmark of corruption with Chinese characteristics, but the story and the way it has been told set it apart. Yi was not brought down by a hidden camera or ownership of dozens of houses; his career was fated to end the day his lover, a married 34-year-old post-doctoral researcher at the bureau, posted a 120,000-word account of their affair online.

Titled "Waking up from the Beijing Dream, to float or sink – a record of Yi Junqing's Nth Lover"  (一朝忽觉京梦醒,半世浮沉雨打萍 ——衣俊卿小n实录), the account reads as part diary, part dime novel. It gives all the gritty and mundane details of the pair's professional and sex life over the course of their year-long affair. After the piece went viral on the Chinese internet, it was quickly removed and Chang Yan, the author and protagonist, claimed it was a work of fiction written under extreme emotional distress. Given the number of confirmable details in the piece, that explanation fell flat. Five weeks later, Bureau Chief Yi was out of a job.

Media attention in both China and the West has largely focused on what the piece says about the fallen official. The juicy details are enticing, but even more revealing is the account it provides of a woman trying to navigate a male-dominated, pseudo-academic bureaucracy governed by a murky set of "unspoken rules" (潜规则). It gives outsiders a glimpse into what happens when Marxist academics gain control over a large government bureaucracy, the many perks that it has to dole out, and the game of sexual politics that may be played to win these perks.

These images, showing Ms. Chang at left and Mr. Yi at right, have been widely circulated on Chinese social media. (Via Weibo)

Chang Yan's account stretches from March 2011 through December of 2012, chronicling the days from her first interview at the bureau up until publication of her expose. In the year leading up to publication, Chang and Yi allegedly slept together seventeen times, all while exchanging gifts, promises and more than a little cash. The narrative is clear, but interesting and puzzling questions surround the mechanisms and motives for the Chang and Yi's relationship. While Bureau Chief Yi appears to be in it for the predictable combination of sex and money (and maybe love), Chang's motivations are far more fluid.

The relationship begins as part of Ms. Chang's efforts to ingratiate herself to the bureau and gain a coveted Beijing residence permit, or hukou, in the process. But for much of the story she appears to be blindly feeling her way through a man's world, a bureaucracy packed with older male academics and several young female post-docs hoping to make their mark on Marxist studies. Chang is by no means a novice — she admits to giving many bribes and faking documents for her post-doc university application — but she still finds herself being toyed with by men who have been playing the game for far longer.

Yi and Chang first met at her interview for a post-doctoral position at the Compilation and Translation Bureau, a Party body dedicated to the Marxist theoretical foundations of government policies. Chang was hurt when Yi dismissed her proposed research topic, and she left the interview determined to win over the man, a spot at the bureau, and a Beijing hukou.

That process began in June of 2011 with a 10,000 RMB (approximately US$1,600) gift from Chang designed to "test the waters." Over the summer of 2011, the once professional relationship took on a more personal tone with text messages and a gift of earrings from Yi to Chang. Over their first dinner together, Yi boasted that he wasn't the kind of teacher who would take on doctoral students for just a thirty or fifty-thousand RMB bribe. In the journal Chang writes, "At the time I thought he was a real straight-shooter. Now I can read between the lines: 30 or 50 is too little, 80 or 100,000 would do the trick." Over that same dinner Chang finds herself puzzling over the main question: "Does he want money, or me?" She didn't get her answer that night, and at a conference that summer she went up to Yi's room in an attempt to resolve the question:

I sat on the sofa and covered almost half of my face with my high collar. I was really nervous and just couldn't figure out what it was that he actually wanted to express. I'd already gone too far by going up to his room. It was really embarrassing, so after talking for a minute I made my retreat. The second day at the conference I pretended I couldn't see him. I felt like I'd really lost face.

Chang found herself caught up in a game with unspoken rules and no clear answer as to who was doing the refereeing. She had passed her first interview, but the process of entering the bureau and switching hukou was turning out to be far more complicated. At a bureau banquet, Chang spoke with the bureau's head of human resources, who made sure to emphasize that she still lived in the bureau-provided apartment, and without their help would not gain a position. That night, she cried while trying to figure out who was behind the threats.

In my tiny room I tried desperately to figure it out and I cried until the tears fell off my face. I was going crazy: is it Yang [secretary of the bureau] or Yi? Do they want to force me out? … Women's and men's way of thinking really are different, so I couldn't figure out what it was that Yi was doing. Now I think back, if I'd just obediently taken off my clothes or handed over cash I wouldn't have been bullied by people at every turn.

Eventually a combination of sushi and sake led to the beginning of Yi and Chang's physical relationship. Still unclear of where she stood, Chang capped off their first sexual encounter by giving Yi 50,000 RMB in cash.

At their second meeting, Yi riffed on the connections he had and the many bigger postings that could be in his future. It was then that Chang began to fall for the man she'd previously just been using:

When I heard him talk, I became infected by his emotions. In my heart he really was a great man, and the next logical step up was to a major department. … I really hoped he could continue to rise up. Not for anything else, but just so that a man from the northeast with such an indomitable spirit could realize his dream.

But those magnanimous feelings didn't last. Within just three months of their first time together, the relationship was already descending into a tangle of love, jealousy and blackmail that ended with a strange ultimatum from Chang demanding monetary payment.

Chang quickly regretted the ultimatum and took it back, but the event set in motion a 10-month unraveling that would culminate in her publishing the account. As the months passed and her hukou issue remained unresolved, she grew increasingly jealous of other women, including Yi's other female post-doctoral students. Even so, the pair's secret rendezvous continued largely as before, and in April of that year Chang even made another gift of 30,000 RMB to her lover/professor in hopes of moving things along.

But by the summer of 2012, the relationship had begun to deteriorate with all the grace of an ugly high school break up. Chang continued to threaten to "make them both famous" by publicizing the affair, and eventually extorted 1 million RMB from the bureau chief. Even that act of blackmail couldn't keep apart the lovers seemingly hell-bent on career-suicide. Yi used intermediaries to try to prod Chang into returning to her university in Shanxi, but she dug in her heels. The two continued sleeping together regularly.

Chang's narrative ends on August 30, 2012, but relays the following three months by posting all of the couple's thousands of text messages. The messages are often nothing more than a hard copy of the typical sidewalk temper tantrum between Chinese couples.

As with most temper tantrums, Yi's attempts at appeasement only fanned the flames that would eventually devour both his and Chang's careers. In early December, 2012, Chang put the full account online, and last week Xinhua announced that Yi had been removed from his post for his "improper life style."

In explaining the reasons for posting her account, Chang portrayed herself as someone wading into the dark corners of China's academic establishment:

For a women to get by in academic circles is so difficult. I carelessly went in and didn't want to fall behind, so I paid 'the price of development.' I don't deserve pity; I got what I deserve and I'm ready for the consequences. I don't just want to expose the Emperor's new clothes. I've shamelessly and bravely exposed the tip of the iceberg for the hidden rules of academia. … This is a tragedy; I'm a sacrifice and so is Professor Yi.

The expose contributes much to an outsider's understanding of the intersection between China's bureaucracy and the country's ivory towers. But it's clear that Chang's motivations are in no way selfless. She writes honestly and with great self-awareness, but ultimately chooses to tell her story because she chose to play a high-stakes game with her sexuality and her identity. Unfortunately for Chang, she possessed only a vague knowledge of that game's unspoken rules, and ultimately emerged a loser.

Spotted on China’s Web: Who Really Changed America, Obama or the Smartphone?

Posted: 25 Jan 2013 08:27 AM PST

On Sina Weibo, China's major Twitter-like platform, a user with the handle "this is America" (@这里是美国) shared the below image on January 23, two days after U.S. President Barack Obama's second inauguration. The accompanying caption reads: "Who really changed America?"

Obama's second inaugural did not capture the same amount of attention on China's social media that the Democratic convention or November 6 general election garnered. Nonetheless, over 2,000 users commented on the below image. Perhaps surprisingly, among those comments sampled, Blackberry received about the same number of mentions as Apple, Steve Jobs, or the iPhone. According to Reuters, Apple ranks only sixth in smartphone sales in China.

(via Weibo)

 

Presidential Inbox: U.S. Policy in Northeast Asia

Posted: 25 Jan 2013 07:40 AM PST

U.S. President Barack Obama attends the East Asia Summit plenary session in Phnom Penh alongside then Japanese prime minister Yoshihiko Noda and Chinese premier Wen Jiabao

President Obama,

As you consider America's foreign policy challenges, I would urge you to pay particular attention to Northeast Asia. I believe U.S. policy will be tested in this part of Asia, and that our maritime commitments in particular will require clear and committed action. There are leadership transitions there too that deserve some of your personal engagement in building trust.

Let me suggest three areas where I think significant policy attention is warranted.

First, your new foreign policy team will need to embrace your Asia strategy as fully as their predecessors. Asia demands our full and long-term strategic attention and articulating the future direction of the Asia pivot will be essential to maintaining regional confidence in the United States. For those of us who care deeply about U.S. policy towards Asia, your first term Asia team could not have been better. Your second term Asia team will need to be given far deeper resources if they too are to successfully execute your Asia strategy. Strong leadership and deep Asia experience and expertise will continue to be the prerequisites for success, especially in relations with Tokyo, Seoul, and Beijing. In Northeast Asia, where tensions have risen considerably over the past year, our ability to lend our allies a steadying hand will be most needed and most appreciated.

Second, Northeast Asia has undergone a broad leadership transition. New leaders in Beijing, Tokyo, Pyongyang, and soon in Seoul will mean that we will need to take time to build new relationships. I'm least optimistic about Pyongyang. Kim Jong-un seems to be committed to less cooperation rather than more, and his actions suggest little reason for optimism about change in North Korea's military ambitions. December's successful missile test, as well as his recent response to the enhanced UN sanctions, suggest we are in for a bumpy ride in 2013. On the positive side, leadership changes in Seoul and Tokyo bring in two leaders committed to their relationship with Washington, and ready to work closely with the United States on a whole range of issues, including how to cope with North Korea. Yet relations between these two close allies are strained and will take time to heal. We should do all that we can to support that process, and sustain the energy of our trilateral policy cooperation.

It is the new generation of leaders in China that will deserve your most careful consideration. It is too early to tell if Xi Jinping will prove to be a good partner for the United States in Asia and beyond. But the most immediate test of his new government may be whether he proves to be a good neighbor. For many on the periphery of a rising China, these are uncertain times. Our interests on the Korean peninsula, and more recently on the territorial dispute with Japan, differ considerably from China's. On both of these issues, we must persuade Beijing that maintaining peace and stability in Northeast Asia is our common cause. If needed, Beijing must be reminded that we will defend our treaty allies from coercion and provocation, and we should be unambiguous in our commitment to the defense of Japan should Beijing escalate its island dispute with Tokyo to the level of armed conflict.

Yet we must also lead the effort to develop mechanisms and institutions that will facilitate dispute resolution and confidence building in Asia. Continuing to energize the ASEAN-based institutions for multilateral problem-solving will be important. An annual meeting of defense ministers would be particularly helpful at this time. The East China Sea deserves American attention also, and we should reach out to Beijing, Seoul, and Tokyo to consider crisis management practices and a regime for maritime confidence-building. There is far too much at stake for all of us not to try to de-escalate and regularize maritime interactions there.

Finally, President Obama, let me turn to a relationship that anchors our Asia strategy and without which we cannot implement the rebalancing that you envision. The U.S.-Japan alliance has for half a century demonstrated the power of postwar reconciliation, and the relationship today between the American and Japanese people is strong and our shared interests abiding. We saw that in the Japanese response to 9/11 and Katrina, and you reciprocated when the need was greatest in Japan in the wake of the devastating earthquake and tsunami that hit on March 11.

Japan today faces a rising China, a nuclear North Korea, and difficult political relations with its neighbors in South Korea and even Russia. In the face of these challenges, there are many in Japan who think it is time to change course; to reconsider Japan's postwar diplomacy and strategic choice of military self-restraint. There is, I believe, a growing perception within Japan that their postwar commitments have not been rewarded with friendship and respect, and that they continue to be punished for events that cannot today be undone.

I believe the Japanese people will wisely reaffirm their postwar convictions, but U.S. policy will play a large role in shaping both the substance and the tenor of that Japanese debate. If our alliance with Japan is strong, then the concerns about today's challenges in Northeast Asia will be met carefully and calmly. Your leadership will be needed to set higher sights for this vital partnership. We must fulfill our promise to close Futenma Air Station in Okinawa, and rid our relationship of this debilitating squabble. We must encourage Japan to stand with us on the Trans-Pacific Partnership. But neither of these issues should define our relationship with Tokyo.

Historical reconciliation is a tremendous challenge for the peoples of Northeast Asia, and in today's changing strategic environment, nationalism can easily become corrosive. Our role cannot simply be one of strategic partner; we must also consider our own role in shaping the destiny of Northeast Asia. Your ambassador, John V. Roos, began our process of healing the wounds of World War II by commemorating the tremendous loss of life in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and in doing so, he earned the profound admiration of the Japanese people. When so many in the region today are having difficulty in finding an adequate expression of forgiveness for that terrible chapter of history, you have the opportunity to lead the way—to illuminate the path toward acknowledging the terrible costs of war.

Northeast Asia continues to require your close attention, Mr. President. The last several years have demonstrated that some of our most important alliance commitments are coming under strain as a dynamic shift in the regional balance of power is fostering anxious nationalisms. Your Asia policy team will need to be steady and creative; will need to be bold and subtle; and, most of all will need to know how to work comfortably within this new and emerging Asia

Children, Who Is This Man?

Posted: 25 Jan 2013 06:39 AM PST

Chinese author Mo Yan shot to international fame when he won the Nobel Prize for Literature in October 2012, and his success was wildly celebrated in his home country. No doubt many harbor hopes that Mo Yan can inspire a new generation of young writers in China.

Before they can be inspired by Mo Yan, however, they might need to learn who he is first.

In photos of an elementary school quiz posted on Sina Weibo, China's Twitter, children were asked to identify a picture of Mo Yan and write down their thoughts. Here are what some fifth graders in Nanjing came up with:

"This man seems conceited because he looks at people sideways. It seems that he looks down on others. We cannot be like that, because that would cause failure."

"He is Zhou Libo [a stand-up comedian]. He is quite a talker and is pretty funny. He is beloved by the people."

"He is Zhao Benshan [a skit comedian]. I want to tell him that I am quite impressed with your skills, but I feel  sorry that you withdrew from the CCTV's Chinese New Year Gala."

"He is a human being."

China’s Patent Game for Clean-Energy Cars

Posted: 25 Jan 2013 12:06 AM PST

With over 2000 patents for alternative-energy cars filed last year, China is biting into the market for clean transportation. From Jeff Spross at Think Progress:

China has actually been in the game for sometime. In 2011, the country's office received more applications — for all forms of invention, not just — than any other nation. At the same time, very few Chinese investors seek to patent their ideas abroad — less than 5 percent between 2005 and 2009. Generally speaking, if an inventor has an idea of genuine merit, they'll seek to patent it as many places as possible. Concentrating merely on China's office could be an indication that other incentives are driving the patent, such as the chance to snatch up a government subsidy.

The race between various countries to accrue patents in alternative-energy also raises the possibility of "patent wars," such as those that have riled the world of software. Companies and interests attempt to round up and hoard patents in order to corner sources of revenue. That is, of course, very profitable for them, but it also tends to dampen innovation in the relevant industry. The spread of patents forces companies and inventors to spendever more time and money making sure every conceptual aspect of the technology they're working on is in the legal clear, or is properly licensed. That drives up costs for the companies, for consumers, and slows down the creation of new products and technologies that can raise everyone's well-being — like cars and other forms of transport powered by sustainable energy. It arguably even drives upinequality.

The problem is especially acute in the software world, where it's especially difficult to organize who has the rights to what into a public and easily-searchable database. But in principle the inefficiencies and transaction costs that come with over-zealous competition for patents can afflict any industry, including green tech and green transportation.

See more on green technology via CDT.


© Mengyu Dong for China Digital Times (CDT), 2013. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: , , ,
Download Tools to Circumvent the Great Firewall

Photo: The Waiting Merchant, by Mr Paz

Posted: 25 Jan 2013 12:05 AM PST

Survey: Manufacturing Growth Highest in Two Years

Posted: 25 Jan 2013 12:00 AM PST

China's factory sector growth reached a two-year high in January, according to a preliminary survey released on Thursday, as the economy continues to demonstrate signs of a rebound. From Reuters:

The flash purchasing managers' index () rose to 51.9 in January, the highest since January 2011 and above the 50-point level that shows accelerating growth in the sector from the previous month.

The PMI, the earliest preview of China's economic health in 2013, is the latest indication that the world's second-largest economy is steadily recovering from a near two-year cool-down.

"Despite the still tepid external demand, the domestic-driven restocking process is likely to add steam to China's ongoing recovery in the coming months," Qu Hongbin, chief China economist at HSBC, said on Thursday.

The Wall Street Journal points out that HSBC's PMI reading, which focuses more on small and medium-sized private business as opposed to the SOE-focused official PMI, has been above 50 for three straight months:

"The positive momentum is likely to be sustained in the first half of the year," said Li Wei, China economist at Standard Chartered. "The general feeling at the moment is that growth is picking up—we should see good growth at least in the first two quarters."

Meanwhile, at the in , the head of China's National Economic Research Institute claimed that China is in the midst of a recovery:

Fan Gang told a session on China's growth prospects at the World Economic Forum in this Swiss Alpine resort that the world's second-largest economy should grow faster in 2013 than it did last year.

China posted growth of 7.8 percent last year, its weakest performance since the 1990s, but its economy started reviving at the end of the year when growth rose to 7.9 percent, up from the two previous quarters.

"Now I can say the '' has landed last year, and now it's under way to recovery," said Fan, whose institute is part of the Chinese government.


© Scott Greene for China Digital Times (CDT), 2013. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: , , , , , ,
Download Tools to Circumvent the Great Firewall

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Blogs » Politics » In Defense of China’s Golden Week

Blogs » Politics » Xu Zhiyong: An Account of My Recent Disappearance

Blogs » Politics » Chen Guangcheng’s Former Prison Evaporates